Showing 41–60 of 65 results
alleged retaliation as a defense to the complaint. A court commissioner rejected
It is unlawful for the owner of any building for the purpose of harassing, punishing or retaliating against the tenant thereof to interfere with the peaceable possession of the tenant by committing any of the following acts: (4). Evicting,
[4] The court later dismissed park owners Kevin and Kari Ware in part, several of the tenants' causes of action, and the tenants' CPA and retaliation claims.
Carlstrom concedes that Hanline may bring any action for retaliation or wrongful eviction. Hanline was not precluded of his right to a trial by jury on these issues under RCW 59.18.380. But, Hanline has no right to jury...
"Reprisal or retaliatory action" shall mean and include but not be limited to any of the following actions by the landlord when such actions are intended primarily to retaliate against a tenant because of the tenant's good faith and...
We first address appellant's argument that the trial court erred when it held that the RLTA did not apply to the Olivia Park Group Home, thereby depriving appellant of the opportunity to raise the statutory affirmative defense of retaliation...
4 The court later dismissed park owners Kevin and Kari Ware in part, several of the tenants’ causes of action, and the tenants’ CPA and retaliation claims.
Anderson and Bussell argue that we are not bound by this exception because the definition allows a finding of retaliation for circumstances not listed in the statute. They contend the sole purpose of the list and the exception is to...
"Reprisal or retaliatory action" shall mean and include but not be limited to any of the following actions by the landlord when such actions are intended primarily to retaliate against a tenant because of the tenant's good faith and...
Moreover, the next supreme court decision addressing an affirmative defense to unlawful detainer held that the residential tenant could not assert a retaliation claim (based on ordinance): "the court sits as a special statutory tribunal to summarily decide the issues...
Anderson and Bussell allege they were evicted in retaliation for their assertion of their rights under the Act. They contend that RCW 59.18.240(2) and .250 authorize this retaliatory eviction defense. Stephanus responds that RCW 59.18.240...
...Hanline also argues that he was evicted in retaliation of his complaints to the DCLU. Carlstrom argues that Hanline’s lease had expired and therefore neither the JCEO nor the rebuttable presumption applies. We agree with Carlstrom.
8 The Egberts argue that because the Jorgensens were behind on rent, there can be no presumption of retaliation and, in fact, the Egberts should receive a rebuttable presumption that their eviction action is not retaliatory. The Jorgensens respond that...
8 The Egberts argue that because the Jorgensens were behind on rent, there can be no presumption of retaliation and, in fact, the Egberts should receive a rebuttable presumption that their eviction action is not retaliatory. The Jorgensens respond that...
...And a writ of restitution was to issue if he did not vacate or if any farther noncompliance notices were received, or if Purvis retaliated against complaining neighbors. The order was approved by Sherri Purvis acting pro se, Sullivan, and...
...And a writ of restitution was to issue if he did not vacate or if any further noncompliance notices were received, or if Purvis retaliated against complaining neighbors. The order was approved by Sherri Purvis acting pro se, Sullivan, and...
...for denial of fees.[14] The Residential Landlord-Tenant Act prohibits fees to pro bono attorneys only on unlawful retaliation claims.[15] Nothing in the act prohibits fees to pro bono attorneys defending tenants in unlawful detainer actions. The court...
Several courts have ruled otherwise and held that the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits a state court from evicting a tenant when the landlord seeks the eviction in retaliation for the tenant's exercise of his constitutional rights. Hosey v. Club Van...
...of fees.14 The Residential Landlord-Tenant Act of 1973 prohibits fees to pro bono attorneys only on unlawful retaliation claims.15 Nothing in the act prohibits fees to pro bono attorneys defending tenants in unlawful detainer actions. The court...
...Council House supported its position with the following footnote: “The Defendant recently dismissed her claim for retaliation pursuant to RCW 59.18.250, which would not have provided for fees in any event since Defendant’s lawyers are working pro...