Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Showing 41–57 of 57 results

Lian v. Stalick, 106 Wash. App. 811 (2001)

Lian v. Stalick, 106 Wash. App. 811 (2001) Washington state

...performed repairs on these stairs would have been an essential component of Ms. White’s cause of action. Here, that theory was not specifically alleged. Ms. White alleged instead a failure to maintain the premises in a habitable condition. And...

Lian v. Stalick, 25 P.3d 467 (2001)

Lian v. Stalick, 25 P.3d 467 (2001) Washington state

...performed repairs on these stairs would have been an essential component of Ms. White's cause of action. Here, that theory was not specifically alleged. Ms. White alleged instead a failure to maintain the premises in a habitable condition. And...

Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)

Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003) Washington state

...625 (1924) (basing liability on constructive knowledge where landlord would have discovered the defect if he had made the repairs he was supposed to make near the defect). *256 Implied Warranty of Habitability.

Martini v. Post, 178 Wash. App. 153 (2013)

Martini v. Post, 178 Wash. App. 153 (2013) Washington state

¶42 Here, like the plaintiff in Lian I who notified her landlord of the decrepit stairs, Martini notified Post of the defective windows in the northeast bedroom on several occasions and gave Post permission to enter the home to repair...

Aspon v. Loomis, 816 P.2d 751 (1991)

Aspon v. Loomis, 816 P.2d 751 (1991) Washington state

...keep the premises fit for human habitation at all times during a tenancy." The trial court rejected the proposed instruction on the basis that the landlord-tenant act imposed a duty to repair only with respect to conditions specifically enumerated...

Martini v. Post, 178 Wash. App. 153 (2013)

Martini v. Post, 178 Wash. App. 153 (2013) Washington state

...Martini contends that Post is liable for Abson’s death because he breached his duties under the RLTA and the implied warranty of habitability. In so arguing, Martini urges us to adopt the Restatement (Second) of Property: Landlord and Tenant...

Lian v. Stalick, 106 Wash. App. 811 (2001)

Lian v. Stalick, 106 Wash. App. 811 (2001) Washington state

...Stalick failed to maintain the steps, as a structural component of the dwelling, in good repair so as to render them usable and capable of withstanding normal forces and loads. RCW 59.18.060(2). And it is obvious Mr...

Lian v. Stalick, 25 P.3d 467 (2001)

Lian v. Stalick, 25 P.3d 467 (2001) Washington state

...Stalick failed to maintain the steps, as a structural component of the dwelling, in good repair so as to render them usable and capable of withstanding normal forces and loads. RCW 59.18.060(2). And it is obvious Mr...

Atherton Condominium Apartment-Owners Ass'n v. Blume Development Co., 115 Wash. 2d 506 (1990)

Atherton Condominium Apartment-Owners Ass'n v. Blume Development Co., 115 Wash. 2d 506 (1990) Washington state

...Owners sought damages for the cost to repair the alleged construction defects. With respect to Blume, Owners alleged that Blume failed to construct Atherton in accordance with the approved plans and the UBC fire resistivity standards. Accordingly, they brought an...

Eastwood v. Horse Harbor Foundation, Inc., 170 Wash. 2d 380 (2010)

Eastwood v. Horse Harbor Foundation, Inc., 170 Wash. 2d 380 (2010) Washington state

...We recognized that original purchasers could recover damages from the condominium builder-vendor for breach of an implied warranty of habitability under the law of contracts. Id. at 421. But, with an eye toward public policy considerations, we refused to...

ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co., 799 P.2d 250 (1990)

ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co., 799 P.2d 250 (1990) Washington state

...Owners sought damages for the cost to repair the alleged construction defects. With respect to Blume, Owners alleged that Blume failed to construct Atherton in accordance with the approved plans and the UBC fire resistivity standards. Accordingly, they brought an...

Eastwood v. Horse Harbor Foundation, Inc., 241 P.3d 1256 (2010)

Eastwood v. Horse Harbor Foundation, Inc., 241 P.3d 1256 (2010) Washington state

...We recognized that original purchasers could recover damages from the condominium builder-vendor for breach of an implied warranty of habitability under the law of contracts. Id. at 421, 745 P.2d 1284. But, with an eye toward public policy...

Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)

Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003) Washington state

...1988) (no residential landlord-tenant act but liability under common law if tenant is injured due to defective condition the landlord agreed to repair or negligently repaired; violation of building codes is negligence per se); Houston v. York, 755 So...

Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)

Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003) Washington state

...Nor-Cen, Inc., 527 N.E.2d 1157, 1160 (Ind.Ct.App.1988) (no residential landlord-tenant act but liability under common law if tenant is injured due to defective condition the landlord agreed to repair or negligently repaired; violation...

State v. Schwab, 693 P.2d 108 (1985)

State v. Schwab, 693 P.2d 108 (1985) Washington state

...If the tenant remains on the premises, he must await the repair process. In the event of judicial action, a court may grant damages or abatement of rent, but neither of these will restore the premises to a habitable state...

State v. Schwab, 693 P.2d 108 (1985)

State v. Schwab, 693 P.2d 108 (1985) Washington state

...If the tenant remains on the premises, he must await the repair process. In the event of judicial action, a court may grant damages or abatement of rent, but neither of these will restore the premises to a habitable state...

Hawkins v. Diel, 166 Wash. App. 1 (2011)

Hawkins v. Diel, 166 Wash. App. 1 (2011) Washington state

...They contend that DMC breached its duty, implied in law or explicit in the lease, to repair and maintain a habitable premise. The question is whether the Hawkinses can recover general damages from DMC under a theory of negligent infliction...