Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Showing 21–40 of 235 results

Segura v. Cabrera (2015)

Segura v. Cabrera (2015) Washington state

rent, $600 for a rental security deposit, and $150 as a deposit for electric utility service.

Segura v. Cabrera (2015)

Segura v. Cabrera (2015) Washington state

the first month's prepaid rent and the security deposit, $150.00 for the utility deposit,

Segura v. Cabrera (2015)

Segura v. Cabrera (2015) Washington state

rent, $600 for a rental security deposit, and $150 as a deposit for electric utility service.

Segura v. Cabrera (2015)

Segura v. Cabrera (2015) Washington state

the first month's prepaid rent and the security deposit, $150.00 for the utility deposit,

James S. Black & Co. v. Charron, 22 Wash. App. 11 (1978)

James S. Black & Co. v. Charron, 22 Wash. App. 11 (1978) Washington state

Finally, appellant contends that the security deposit addendum to the lease operated as liquidated damages, and therefore, respondent's recovery is limited to the $225 deposit. We find no merit to this contention. The addendum was clearly labeled a "Security...

Draper MacHine Works, Inc. v. Hagberg, 663 P.2d 141 (1983)

Draper MacHine Works, Inc. v. Hagberg, 663 P.2d 141 (1983) Washington state

Although the provision is somewhat self-contradicting, read as a whole it appears the deposit was intended as security against actual damages and was not for additional consideration. Thus, the security deposit should be applied toward payment of the judgment.

Columbia Debt Recovery, Llc, V. Yemeserach Gebreseralse (2022)

Columbia Debt Recovery, Llc, V. Yemeserach Gebreseralse (2022) Washington state

Forfeiture or retention of the security deposit is not a release or waiver of Resident’s obligation to pay all rents due or to pay for the costs of cleaning, painting, repairs or maintenance relating to Resident’s occupancy which...

Section 2

Rental Housing Assoc., App/x-resps V. City Of Seattle, Resp/x-app (2022) Washington state

security deposits toward rent and temporarily prohibited landlords from initiating

Section 2

Rental Housing Assoc., App/x-resps V. City Of Seattle, Resp/x-app (2022) Washington state

security deposits toward rent and temporarily prohibited landlords from initiating

Section Cmty

Virginia Chiu & Vincent Liew, Appellants\cross-resps. V. Brian Hoskins, Respondent\cross-apps. (2023) Washington state

The trial court concluded that Hoskins charged a security deposit in excess

Section Cmty

Virginia Chiu & Vincent Liew, Appellants\cross-resps. V. Brian Hoskins, Respondent\cross-apps. (2023) Washington state

award damages based on the security deposit violation because it found that

Section Cmty

Virginia Chiu & Vincent Liew, Appellants\cross-resps. V. Brian Hoskins, Respondent\cross-apps. (2023) Washington state

double any penalties imposed, (3) double the amount of any security deposit

Section Cmty

Virginia Chiu & Vincent Liew, Appellants\cross-resps. V. Brian Hoskins, Respondent\cross-apps. (2023) Washington state

subsection (b) provides two ways to “give” the required security deposit statement

Section Cmty

Virginia Chiu & Vincent Liew, Appellants\cross-resps. V. Brian Hoskins, Respondent\cross-apps. (2023) Washington state

withhold a security deposit. Because Hoskins violated SMC 7.24.035(A), SMC