Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Showing 21–40 of 65 results

Scott Egbert v. Richard Jorgensen (2025)

Scott Egbert v. Richard Jorgensen (2025) Washington state

Jorgensens failure to comply with the eviction notice. The Egberts promptly moved for a show cause hearing. III. THE JORGENSENS’ RETALIATION CLAIM

Scott Egbert v. Richard Jorgensen (2025)

Scott Egbert v. Richard Jorgensen (2025) Washington state

Jorgensens failure to comply with the eviction notice. The Egberts promptly moved for a show cause hearing. III. THE JORGENSENS’ RETALIATION CLAIM

Lian v. Stalick, 106 Wash. App. 811 (2001)

Lian v. Stalick, 106 Wash. App. 811 (2001) Washington state

...Fear of retaliation is no excuse given the tenant’s protection under the statute. RCW 59.18.240, .250. Indeed, there is a presumption of retaliation if the landlord takes adverse action toward the tenant in the 90 days after...

Lian v. Stalick, 25 P.3d 467 (2001)

Lian v. Stalick, 25 P.3d 467 (2001) Washington state

...Fear of retaliation is no excuse given the tenant's protection under the statute. RCW 59.18.240, .250. Indeed, there is a presumption of retaliation if the landlord takes adverse action toward the tenant in the 90 days after...

Stephanus v. Anderson, 613 P.2d 533 (1980)

Stephanus v. Anderson, 613 P.2d 533 (1980) Washington state

"reprisal or retaliatory action" includes retaliation by eviction but also includes an express exception for an eviction pursuant to RCW 59.18.200.

Stephanus v. Anderson, 613 P.2d 533 (1980)

Stephanus v. Anderson, 613 P.2d 533 (1980) Washington state

Stephanus v. Anderson 613 P.2d 533 Date filed: 1980-06-02 Doctrine: retaliation Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1144778/stephanus-v-anderson/ --- 010combined by Ringold --- Ringold, J.

Stephanus v. Anderson, 613 P.2d 533 (1980)

Stephanus v. Anderson, 613 P.2d 533 (1980) Washington state

Anderson and Bussell finally argue that a Washington court may not issue a writ of restitution when the landlord's sole reason for an eviction is to retaliate for a tenant's exercise of First Amendment 4