Showing 1–20 of 65 results
"Reprisal or retaliatory action" shall mean and include but not be limited to any of the following actions by the landlord when such actions are intended primarily to retaliate against a tenant because of the tenant's good faith and...
...PROVIDED FURTHER, That the presumption of retaliation, with respect to an eviction, may be rebutted by evidence that it is not practical to make necessary repairs while the tenant remains in occupancy. In any action or eviction proceeding where the...
support their retaliation claim. Among other documents, they submitted the following.
support their retaliation claim. Among other documents, they submitted the following.
Hailey Jorgensen submitted two declarations in support of the retaliation claim. Hailey
Scott filed a declaration refuting the alleged retaliation. Addressing his reasoning for
also contended that Jackson’s harassment of them supported their retaliation claim.
Hailey Jorgensen submitted two declarations in support of the retaliation claim. Hailey
Scott filed a declaration refuting the alleged retaliation. Addressing his reasoning for
also contended that Jackson’s harassment of them supported their retaliation claim.
The Egberts also questioned the veracity of the Jorgensens’ retaliation claim. They argued
The Egberts also questioned the veracity of the Jorgensens’ retaliation claim. They argued
In their answer, the Jorgensens raised a retaliation defense. The Jorgensens argued that the
IV. THE EGBERTS’ RESPONSE TO THE JORGENSENS’ RETALIATION CLAIM A. DECLARATION OF SCOTT EGBERT
landlord, including eviction, that was “intended primarily to retaliate against a tenant because of
they “submitted ample evidence of retaliation” that undercut the Egberts’ credibility and created a
In their answer, the Jorgensens raised a retaliation defense. The Jorgensens argued that the
IV. THE EGBERTS’ RESPONSE TO THE JORGENSENS’ RETALIATION CLAIM A. DECLARATION OF SCOTT EGBERT
landlord, including eviction, that was “intended primarily to retaliate against a tenant because of
they “submitted ample evidence of retaliation” that undercut the Egberts’ credibility and created a