DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Showing 1–20 of 59 results

9 V.S.A. § 4506

9 V.S.A. § 4506 Vermont state

(Cite as: 9 V.S.A. § 4506) § 4506. Enforcement; civil action; retaliation prohibited

9 V.S.A. § 4503

9 V.S.A. § 4503 Vermont state

(B) retaliating against a tenant or occupant for exercising his or her rights;

10 V.S.A. § 6247

10 V.S.A. § 6247 Vermont state

(Cite as: 10 V.S.A. § 6247) § 6247. Retaliatory conduct prohibited (a) A park owner may not retaliate by any of the following: (1) establishing or changing terms of a rental agreement;

9 V.S.A. § 4465

9 V.S.A. § 4465 Vermont state

(a) A landlord of a residential dwelling unit may not retaliate by establishing or changing terms of a rental agreement or by bringing or threatening to bring an action against a tenant who:

9 V.S.A. § 4465

9 V.S.A. § 4465 Vermont state

...with applicable health or safety regulations, there is a rebuttable presumption that any termination by the landlord is in retaliation for the tenant having reported the noncompliance. (Added 1985, No. 175 (Adj. Sess.), § 1; amended 2007, No. 176 (Adj. Sess...

Vladyka v. Marsh (2010)

Vladyka v. Marsh (2010) Vermont state

landlord does retaliate, the tenant is entitled to recover damages and reasonable attorney’s

Vladyka v. Marsh (2010)

Vladyka v. Marsh (2010) Vermont state

dwelling unit may not retaliate by bringing an action against a tenant who has complained

Vladyka v. Marsh (2010)

Vladyka v. Marsh (2010) Vermont state

garbage was not theirs. The eviction action by Mr. Vladyka was an act of retaliation.

Lankin v. Stasik (2005)

Lankin v. Stasik (2005) Vermont state

Lankin v. Stasik (citation pending) Date filed: 2005-01-25 Doctrine: retaliation Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4490180/lankin-v-stasik/ --- 010combined ---

Stephens v. Gilmour (2025)

Stephens v. Gilmour (2025) Vermont state

Order Page 8 of 10 24-CV-04273 Juliet Stephens v. Shannon Gilmour et al payment of rent) of that oral lease, and that this case was filed in retaliation for her

Northgate Hous. Ltd. v. White (2004)

Northgate Hous. Ltd. v. White (2004) Vermont state

Northgate Hous. Ltd. v. White (citation pending) Date filed: 2004-11-19 Doctrine: retaliation Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4490205/northgate-hous-ltd-v-white/ --- 010combined ---

Houle v. Quenneville, 787 A.2d 1258 (2001)

Houle v. Quenneville, 787 A.2d 1258 (2001) Vermont state

Tenants rely on cases from other jurisdictions as support for their argument that landlords have the burden to disprove the retaliation claim or produce evidence of another legitimate, nonretaliatory motive. The cases relied on by tenants, however, interpret statutes and...

Houle v. Quenneville, 787 A.2d 1258 (2001)

Houle v. Quenneville, 787 A.2d 1258 (2001) Vermont state

Tenants rely on cases from other jurisdictions as support for their argument that landlords have the burden to disprove the retaliation claim or produce evidence of another legitimate, nonretaliatory motive. The cases relied on by tenants, however, interpret statutes and...

Houle v. Quenneville, 787 A.2d 1258 (2001)

Houle v. Quenneville, 787 A.2d 1258 (2001) Vermont state

Accordingly, we hold that the court correctly assigned to tenants the burden of proving their affirmative defense of retaliatory eviction. III. Finding of no retaliation

Houle v. Quenneville, 787 A.2d 1258 (2001)

Houle v. Quenneville, 787 A.2d 1258 (2001) Vermont state

Accordingly, we hold that the court correctly assigned to tenants the burden of proving their affirmative defense of retaliatory eviction. III. Finding of no retaliation

Houle v. Quenneville, 787 A.2d 1258 (2001)

Houle v. Quenneville, 787 A.2d 1258 (2001) Vermont state

...a)((l)-(3)] of this section within three months before the alleged act of retaliation creates a presumption that the landlord’s conduct was in retaliation unless and until credible evidence is introduced which would support a finding of legitimate...

Houle v. Quenneville, 787 A.2d 1258 (2001)

Houle v. Quenneville, 787 A.2d 1258 (2001) Vermont state

...1)(3)] of this section within three months *1267 before the alleged act of retaliation creates a presumption that the landlord's conduct was in retaliation unless and until credible evidence is introduced which would support a finding of legitimate...