Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Showing 61–80 of 679 results

Edwards v. Marin Park, Inc., 356 F.3d 1058 (2004)

Edwards v. Marin Park, Inc., 356 F.3d 1058 (2004) United States federal

...Moreover, Swierkiewicz's liberal reading of Rule 8(a) applies with equal force to discrimination and retaliation claims, so it must similarly apply to FHA retaliation claims. See Walker v. Thompson, 288 F.3d 1005, 1011 (7th Cir.2002) (applying...

Edwards v. Marin Park, Inc., 356 F.3d 1058 (2004)

Edwards v. Marin Park, Inc., 356 F.3d 1058 (2004) United States federal

...Moreover, Smerkieuncz’s liberal reading of Rule 8(a) applies with equal force to discrimination and retaliation claims, so it must similarly apply to FHA retaliation claims. See Walker v. Thompson, 288 F.3d 1005, 1011 (7th Cir.2002) (applying...

Greg Moore v. Sean Garnand, 83 F.4th 743 (2023)

Greg Moore v. Sean Garnand, 83 F.4th 743 (2023) United States federal

...See Beck, 527 F.3d at 868–69 (analyzing First Amendment retaliation claims based on “brusque comments” and “advocacy efforts”); Lacey, 693 F.3d at 916–17 (analyzing First Amendment retaliation claims based on “newspaper articles criticizing public officials”). 16...

§ 2000e-2

Abril-Rivera v. Johnson, 806 F.3d 599 (2015) United States federal

- 19 - B. Retaliation as to Rotational Staffing Plan and as to Closing Title VII also makes it unlawful "'for employers to

Wetzel v. Glen St. Andrew Living Cmty., LLC, 901 F.3d 856 (2018)

Wetzel v. Glen St. Andrew Living Cmty., LLC, 901 F.3d 856 (2018) United States federal

Indeed, if we were to read the FHA's anti-retaliation provision to require that a plaintiff allege discriminatory animus, it would be an anomaly. The FHA's anti-retaliation provision makes it unlawful "to coerce, intimidate, threaten, or interfere...

Greg Moore v. Sean Garnand, 83 F.4th 743 (2023)

Greg Moore v. Sean Garnand, 83 F.4th 743 (2023) United States federal

The panel reversed the district court’s order on summary judgment denying qualified immunity to police officers in an action alleging, in part, First Amendment retaliation arising from defendants’ investigation of two arsons at properties connected to plaintiff Greg Moore...

Gallagher v. Magner Ex Rel. City of St. Paul's Department of Neighborhood Housing & Property Improvement, 619 F.3d 823 (2010)

Gallagher v. Magner Ex Rel. City of St. Paul's Department of Neighborhood Housing & Property Improvement, 619 F.3d 823 (2010) United States federal

The FHA also prohibits retaliation against any person on account of his having exercised or enjoyed a right granted or protected by the FHA. 42 U.S.C. § 3617; see generally Reg’l Econ. Cmty. Action Program, Inc. v. City...

Greg Moore v. Sean Garnand, 83 F.4th 743 (2023)

Greg Moore v. Sean Garnand, 83 F.4th 743 (2023) United States federal

...1995) (a decision to transfer an inmate that preceded the inmate’s television interview could not have been made in retaliation for the interview). As noted below, however, we do consider them in analyzing the First Amendment retaliation claims based...

A Society Without a Name v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 655 F.3d 342 (2011)

A Society Without a Name v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 655 F.3d 342 (2011) United States federal

...Corp., 74 F.3d 1473, 1482-84 (4th Cir.1996) (en banc) (holding that the employer’s revocation of gratuitous healthcare benefits did not violate ERISA’s anti-retaliation provision). Although Stiltner involves ERISA’s anti-retaliation provision (29 U...

Section 8

Batista v. Cooperativa De Vivienda Jardines De San Ignacio, 776 F.3d 38 (2015) United States federal

lacked jurisdiction to decide the retaliation claim. Batista timely appealed that decision. II. We review a district court's decision granting summary

A Society Without a Name v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 655 F.3d 342 (2011)

A Society Without a Name v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 655 F.3d 342 (2011) United States federal

...1996) (en banc) (holding that the employ- er’s revocation of gratuitous healthcare benefits did not vio- late ERISA’s anti-retaliation provision). Although Stiltner involves ERISA’s anti-retaliation provision (29 U.S.C. § 1140), that provision and the...