Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Showing 21–40 of 344 results

Barrientos v. 1801-1825 Morton LLC (2009)

Barrientos v. 1801-1825 Morton LLC (2009) United States federal

...Morton therefore rescinded the Withdrawal Notices and issued Ninety Day Notices to Terminate Tenancy (“Eviction Notices”). The Eviction Notices informed Tenants that

§ 3601

Rita Fox v. Lucille F. Gaines (2021) United States federal

serving Ms. Fox with “fraudulent violation notices” and threatened to evict her

Suella Debolt v. Michael Espy, 47 F.3d 777 (1995)

Suella Debolt v. Michael Espy, 47 F.3d 777 (1995) United States federal

...In short, the FmHA’s failure to review her termination notice was not a cause of her eviction. The plaintiff was evicted because her family outgrew her apartment. She certainly cannot claim that she would have remained in her apartment...

§ 100

Gonzalez v. Lee County Housing Authority, 161 F.3d 1290 (1998) United States federal

...Here again, the mistake was made, because the bookeping department gives the notices for eviction out and then you do not file thru with them. First tenants have no respect for eviction notices and that is why we keep loosing...

§ 3601

Rita Fox v. Lucille F. Gaines, 4 F.4th 1293 (2021) United States federal

serving Ms. Fox with “fraudulent violation notices” and threatened to evict her

Section 3617

Gonzalez v. Lee County Housing Authority, 161 F.3d 1290 (1998) United States federal

...Here again, the mistake was made, because the bookeping department gives the notices for eviction out and then you do not file thru with them. First tenants have no respect for eviction notices and that is why we keep loosing...

Section 2

Thorpe v. Housing Authority of Durham, 393 U.S. 268 (1969) United States federal

3. Specific reason(s) for notice to vacate. For example, if a tenant is being evicted because of undesirable actions, the record should detail the actions which resulted in the determination that eviction should be instituted.

Section 8

Feemster v. BSA LTD. PARTNERSHIP, 548 F.3d 1063 (2008) United States federal

In January 2005, BSA served the remaining tenants with 180-day eviction notices. When the tenants refused to move out at the end of the 180 days, BSA brought an action to evict them in District of Columbia Superior Court...

Luz Gonzalez v. Lee County Housing Authority, 161 F.3d 1290 (1998)

Luz Gonzalez v. Lee County Housing Authority, 161 F.3d 1290 (1998) United States federal

...Here again, the mistake was made, because the bookeping department gives the notices for eviction out and then you do not file thru with them. First tenants have no respect for eviction notices and that is why we keep loosing...

Zephier v. Pierce, 714 F.2d 856 (1983)

Zephier v. Pierce, 714 F.2d 856 (1983) United States federal

...The notice had to state the grounds for eviction and advise the tenant that he or she had ten days to respond to the landlord and to present to the MHRA any objections to the proposed eviction. The MHRA conducted...

Zephier v. Pierce, 714 F.2d 856 (1983)

Zephier v. Pierce, 714 F.2d 856 (1983) United States federal

...The notice had to state the grounds for eviction and advise the tenant that he or she had ten days to respond to the landlord and to present to the MHRA any objections to the proposed eviction. The MHRA conducted...

Section 1480

Barbara Brewer v. Edward R. Madigan, Etc., 945 F.2d 449 (1991) United States federal

...The “written notice” requirement of 42 U.S.C. § 1480(g) is satisfied by the provision requiring the landlord to give tenants a written notice of eviction stating the lease term allegedly violated, the reasons for the eviction and the...

Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)

Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984) United States federal

An owner converting to condominium ownership must have served a notice of termination three years before the institution of any action for eviction. No action could be instituted until the existing lease expired. N.J.Stat.Ann. § 2A:18-61...

Thorpe v. Housing Authority of Durham, 386 U.S. 670 (1967)

Thorpe v. Housing Authority of Durham, 386 U.S. 670 (1967) United States federal

“3. Specific reason (s) for notice to vacate. For example, if a tenant is being evicted because of undesirable actions, the record should detail the actions which resulted in the determination that eviction should be instituted.

Thorpe v. Housing Authority of Durham, 386 U.S. 670 (1967)

Thorpe v. Housing Authority of Durham, 386 U.S. 670 (1967) United States federal

"3. Specific reason(s) for notice to vacate. For example, if a tenant is being evicted because of undesirable actions, the record should detail the actions which resulted in the determination that eviction should be instituted.

Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)

Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984) United States federal

5 An owner converting to condominium ownership must have served a notice of termination three years before the institution of any action for eviction. No action could be instituted until the existing lease expired. N.J.Stat.Ann. Sec. 2A...

Thorpe v. Housing Authority of Durham, 393 U.S. 268 (1969)

Thorpe v. Housing Authority of Durham, 393 U.S. 268 (1969) United States federal

3. Specific reason(s) for notice to vacate. For example, if a tenant is being evicted because of undesirable actions, the record should detail the actions which resulted in the determination that eviction should be instituted.