Ramos v. Granajo, 822 A.2d 936 (2003)
A landlord owes a duty to “[m]ake all repairs and do whatever is necessary to put and keep the premises in a fit and habitable condition.” General Laws 1956 § 34-18-22(a)(2). See Errico v. LaMountain,
Showing 1–10 of 10 results
A landlord owes a duty to “[m]ake all repairs and do whatever is necessary to put and keep the premises in a fit and habitable condition.” General Laws 1956 § 34-18-22(a)(2). See Errico v. LaMountain,
With respect to the landlords’ specific duty to repair and to keep the leased premises in a fit and habitable condition, the trial justice also charged the jury that if it found that defendants had violated this duty imposed by...
In light of the evidence supporting defendants’ breach of their duty to repair and to maintain the leased premises in a fit and habitable condition, we conclude that none of the other alleged misstatements in the trial justice’s negligence...
...Among those obligations that the act imposes on landlords is the duty to “[m]ake all repairs and do whatever is necessary to put and keep the premises in a fit and habitable condition.” Section 34-18-22(2). 3
...housing codes affecting health and safety;” and to “[m]ake all repairs and do whatever is necessary to put and keep the premises in a fit and habitable condition.” This includes a requirement to “[mjaintain in good and safe working...
...It states that “[a] landlord shall: * * * [m]ake all repairs and do whatever is necessary to put and keep the premises in a fit and habitable condition.” Section 34-18-22(a)(2). The act “supersede^ any common-law rules...
...act would have allowed defendants to obtain access to Errico’s premises at reasonable times during the tenancy to conduct repair work and to take any other necessary steps to keep this railing fit and the balcony area habitable. See
...That is, in addition to a landlord’s statutory duty to make repairs and do whatever is necessary to maintain the premises in a fit and habitable condition, the landlord has an obligation to exercise reasonable care for the safety...
...They further claim that their lease agreement with Errico contained no express covenant to repair, that there was insufficient evidence of a defect in the balcony railing or, if the railing was defective, the defect was latent and they were...
...The jury found that the railing constituted a dangerous condition, that this condition caused her injuries, and that the landlords were hable to the tenant for their negligence in faffing to repair the defective raffing or to warn the tenant...