Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Showing 21–40 of 51 results

Danielle v. Ricci, 705 A.2d 994 (1997)

Danielle v. Ricci, 705 A.2d 994 (1997) Rhode Island state

Danielle v. Ricci 705 A.2d 994 Date filed: 1997-12-15 Doctrine: security_deposit Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5135596/danielle-v-ricci/ --- 020lead --- ORDER

Powers v. Coccia, 861 A.2d 466 (2004)

Powers v. Coccia, 861 A.2d 466 (2004) Rhode Island state

Powers v. Coccia 861 A.2d 466 Date filed: 2004-12-09 Doctrine: security_deposit Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2401900/powers-v-coccia/ --- 010combined --- OPINION PER CURIAM.

Spano v. Hanna Abdalla, 01-2362 (2002) (2002)

Spano v. Hanna Abdalla, 01-2362 (2002) (2002) Rhode Island state

Spano v. Hanna Abdalla, 01-2362 (2002) (citation pending) Date filed: 2002-10-03 Doctrine: security_deposit Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4114618/spano-v-hanna-abdalla-01-2362-2002/ --- 020lead ---

Powers v. Coccia, 861 A.2d 466 (2004)

Powers v. Coccia, 861 A.2d 466 (2004) Rhode Island state

Although we now address plaintiffs’ appeal in the negligence action, an affidavit introduced into evidence by defendant in the security deposit suit but excluded in the negligence suit‘is at the heart of our decision.

Foley v. Osborne Court Condominium, 96-360 (1999) (1999)

Foley v. Osborne Court Condominium, 96-360 (1999) (1999) Rhode Island state

Foley v. Osborne Court Condominium, 96-360 (1999) (citation pending) Date filed: 1999-07-26 Doctrine: security_deposit Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4112745/foley-v-osborne-court-condominium-96-360-1999/ --- 020lead ---

R.A. Beaufort & Sons, Inc. v. Trivisonno, 403 A.2d 664 (1979)

R.A. Beaufort & Sons, Inc. v. Trivisonno, 403 A.2d 664 (1979) Rhode Island state

The last facet of this appeal necessarily involves a consideration of the proviso which tells the tenant the purposes of the security deposit. In its pertinent part this provision reads as follows:

Daryl Heneault v. Kenneth Lantini, 213 A.3d 410 (2019)

Daryl Heneault v. Kenneth Lantini, 213 A.3d 410 (2019) Rhode Island state

Daryl Heneault v. Kenneth Lantini 213 A.3d 410 Date filed: 2019-06-27 Doctrine: security_deposit Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4633548/daryl-heneault-v-kenneth-lantini/ --- 010combined by Flaherty --- June 27, 2019 June 27, 2019 Supreme Court

Tambor v. Miller, 792 A.2d 744 (2002)

Tambor v. Miller, 792 A.2d 744 (2002) Rhode Island state

...pursuant to chapter 18 of title 34, the Residential Landlord Tenant Act, where that person, although frequently staying at the leased premises, never has paid any rent or given a security deposit, and had no obligation ever to do so.

Sophie F. Bronowiski Mulligan Irrevocable Trust v. Bridges, 44 A.3d 116 (2012)

Sophie F. Bronowiski Mulligan Irrevocable Trust v. Bridges, 44 A.3d 116 (2012) Rhode Island state

...security_deposit Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2303150/sophie-f-bronowiski-mulligan-irrevocable-trust-v-bridges/ --- 010combined by Flaherty --- OPINION Justice FLAHERTY, for the Court. “Either this wallpaper goes, or I do.” 1

Powers v. Coccia, 861 A.2d 466 (2004)

Powers v. Coccia, 861 A.2d 466 (2004) Rhode Island state

...Subsequently, Powers filed two separate lawsuits against defendant, one in the Superior Court for negligence, and another in the District Court, seeking the recovery of her security deposit. 1

Tambor v. Miller, 792 A.2d 744 (2002)

Tambor v. Miller, 792 A.2d 744 (2002) Rhode Island state

...Rani never was a party to either of the Dora/Daniel leases, was not mentioned in either lease, and never paid any rent or security deposit to the Millers.

Sophie F. Bronowiski Mulligan Irrevocable Trust v. Bridges, 44 A.3d 116 (2012)

Sophie F. Bronowiski Mulligan Irrevocable Trust v. Bridges, 44 A.3d 116 (2012) Rhode Island state

...In his answer, defendant also suggested that he and plaintiff agreed to apply his security deposit toward the last month’s rent. On July 21, 2010, a trial was held before a justice of the Superior Court, sitting without a...

Grotta v. Grotta, 01-5494 (2002) (2002)

Grotta v. Grotta, 01-5494 (2002) (2002) Rhode Island state

...Johnson was not a party to a written lease agreement and did not pay rent or give a security deposit, but who frequently stayed at leased premises The precise issue before the court was whether Johnson should be considered a...

FURLAN v. Farrar, 982 A.2d 581 (2009)

FURLAN v. Farrar, 982 A.2d 581 (2009) Rhode Island state

...The trial justice correctly ruled that, because defendant prevented plaintiff and her brother from accessing the apartment after October 6, plaintiff was entitled to the return of her security deposit minus the unpaid, accrued rent for the period from October...

FURLAN v. Farrar, 982 A.2d 581 (2009)

FURLAN v. Farrar, 982 A.2d 581 (2009) Rhode Island state

...The defendant asserts that plaintiff was not entitled to the return of her security deposit — because, in his view, plaintiff owed rent for an additional thirty days after she called defendant on October 6, 2006 to notify him that she...

R.A. Beaufort & Sons, Inc. v. Trivisonno, 403 A.2d 664 (1979)

R.A. Beaufort & Sons, Inc. v. Trivisonno, 403 A.2d 664 (1979) Rhode Island state

...When the “Security Deposit” wording is considered alongside the “Remedy For Breach” language concerning “any damages that shall become due us,” the lease appears to be saying that the security fund will serve as a source for the partial or...