Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Showing 41–60 of 127 results

Dow v. Carter, 122 N.H. 395 (1982)

Dow v. Carter, 122 N.H. 395 (1982) New Hampshire state

Dow v. Carter 122 N.H. 395 Date filed: 1982-05-12 Doctrine: security_deposit Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8089311/dow-v-carter/ --- 020lead ---

Cantwell v. J & R Properties Unlimited, Inc., 924 A.2d 355 (2007)

Cantwell v. J & R Properties Unlimited, Inc., 924 A.2d 355 (2007) New Hampshire state

The plaintiff alleged on information and belief that the defendant had “repeatedly failed to account properly for or to pay interest on security deposits taken from numerous other residential tenants, similarly situated” to him. He contended that, as the number...

LaPonsie v. Kumorek, 122 N.H. 1021 (1982)

LaPonsie v. Kumorek, 122 N.H. 1021 (1982) New Hampshire state

LaPonsie v. Kumorek 122 N.H. 1021 Date filed: 1982-12-10 Doctrine: security_deposit Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1947274/laponsie-v-kumorek/ --- 010combined --- Per curiam.

Woods v. Cobleigh, 75 F. Supp. 125 (1947)

Woods v. Cobleigh, 75 F. Supp. 125 (1947) New Hampshire state

Woods v. Cobleigh 75 F. Supp. 125 Date filed: 1947-12-19 Doctrine: security_deposit Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8707443/woods-v-cobleigh/ --- 020lead by Connor ---

Miller v. Slania Enterprises, Inc., 150 N.H. 655 (2004)

Miller v. Slania Enterprises, Inc., 150 N.H. 655 (2004) New Hampshire state

The plaintiff sued for breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment, violation of the Consumer Protection Act, improper security deposit deductions, and unjust enrichment. The landlord counterclaimed for damages in excess of the security deposit, or alternatively for all of...

§ 11

Flo-Pro v. 10 Iron Horse Drive, et al, 2011 DNH 155 (2011) New Hampshire state

justified expectations. Rather, it was consistent with both. First and foremost, section 17.5(b) of the lease expressly addresses what happens to Flo-Pro's security deposit upon assignment of the landlord's interest in the lease:

Woods v. Cobleigh, 75 F. Supp. 125 (1947)

Woods v. Cobleigh, 75 F. Supp. 125 (1947) New Hampshire state

The defendants further suggest that it was the duty of the Administrator to issue an order nullifying the acts which occurred during the decontrol period, and offer as an analogy the order of the Administrator with reference to security deposits...

Belanger v. MMG Insurance, 153 N.H. 584 (2006)

Belanger v. MMG Insurance, 153 N.H. 584 (2006) New Hampshire state

Belanger v. MMG Insurance 153 N.H. 584 Date filed: 2006-05-26 Doctrine: security_deposit Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8093170/belanger-v-mmg-insurance/ --- 020lead by Galway ---

§ 540

Flo-Pro v. 10 Iron Horse Drive, et al, 2011 DNH 155 (2011) New Hampshire state

...Any default rule on a successor landlord's liability for a security deposit given its predecessor, then, is not helpful to Flo-Pro's motion for a preliminary injunction.