Flo-Pro v. 10 Iron Horse Drive, et al, 2011 DNH 155 (2011)
never furnished Iron Horse with the security deposit reguired by
Showing 41–60 of 127 results
never furnished Iron Horse with the security deposit reguired by
Dow v. Carter 122 N.H. 395 Date filed: 1982-05-12 Doctrine: security_deposit Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8089311/dow-v-carter/ --- 020lead ---
to blame its failure to furnish the security deposit on Iron
provide a standby letter of credit as security deposit." At this
the security deposit under the lease, and conceded at the hearing
provided that Flo-Pro furnished the security deposit in cash and
The plaintiff alleged on information and belief that the defendant had “repeatedly failed to account properly for or to pay interest on security deposits taken from numerous other residential tenants, similarly situated” to him. He contended that, as the number...
furnished the security deposit to Circle Drive in the form of a
Flo-Pro's failure to provide the security deposit, and has moved
LaPonsie v. Kumorek 122 N.H. 1021 Date filed: 1982-12-10 Doctrine: security_deposit Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1947274/laponsie-v-kumorek/ --- 010combined --- Per curiam.
2016) (certifying question of law regarding Massachusetts’ security deposit law
Woods v. Cobleigh 75 F. Supp. 125 Date filed: 1947-12-19 Doctrine: security_deposit Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8707443/woods-v-cobleigh/ --- 020lead by Connor ---
The plaintiff sued for breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment, violation of the Consumer Protection Act, improper security deposit deductions, and unjust enrichment. The landlord counterclaimed for damages in excess of the security deposit, or alternatively for all of...
justified expectations. Rather, it was consistent with both. First and foremost, section 17.5(b) of the lease expressly addresses what happens to Flo-Pro's security deposit upon assignment of the landlord's interest in the lease:
JBL Village Shoppes LLC (“JBL”) for failing to return a security deposit after a
Kris had received a notice in late June stating that her security deposit
5 House, because the residents “provide a security deposit and pay weekly rent to
The defendants further suggest that it was the duty of the Administrator to issue an order nullifying the acts which occurred during the decontrol period, and offer as an analogy the order of the Administrator with reference to security deposits...
Belanger v. MMG Insurance 153 N.H. 584 Date filed: 2006-05-26 Doctrine: security_deposit Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8093170/belanger-v-mmg-insurance/ --- 020lead by Galway ---
...Any default rule on a successor landlord's liability for a security deposit given its predecessor, then, is not helpful to Flo-Pro's motion for a preliminary injunction.