Showing 1–20 of 145 results
Rolfs first claims that Kelly retaliated against him by issuing him four P/DNs and putting him on a PIP. Of course, one does not just retaliate, one retaliates against another person for having done something. Here, for Kelly’s...
retaliation to be actionable, he must have retaliated against
does not just retaliate, one retaliates against another person for having done something. Here, for Kelly’s alleged
actions, then Rolfs’ first retaliation claim is reduced to an assertion that Kelly placed him on a PIP in retaliation for
Kris alleges that, after learning that she had complained to the MHRA and HUD, defendants retaliated against her for that conduct. Specifically, she contends that the retaliation included: (1) Charlene
that Rolfs has established a prima facie case of retaliation for the complaints he made about Kelly to Worcester and Deveno. As with the retaliation claim based upon “Come o n , Gene,”
terms of the lease and not in retaliation for M r . Gadson's
In sum, Rolfs’ own conduct undermines any argument that the P/DNs were adverse employment actions for purposes of his retaliation claim. If the P/DNs were not adverse employment actions, then Rolfs’ first retaliation claim is reduced to an...
FHA retaliation, arising from her complaint to the MHRA regarding the
explanation is pretextual, and that unlawful retaliation was the true motive.
of her remaining four retaliation claims; granted defendants leave to file their
active claims of FHA retaliation asserted against the Dusseaults and the Trust.
The FHA’s anti-retaliation provision protects an individual’s ability to
majority of courts to have considered the question” have concluded “that retaliation
motive to prove her claims of retaliation, courts apply the McDonnell Douglas
In analyzing questions of pretext and true motivation in retaliation cases, in
retaliation was the real motive.” Harrington v. Aggregate Indus. Ne. Region, Inc.,
motion for summary judgment on her FHA retaliation claims against the Trust and
*266Sherryland first contends that the trial court erred by awarding the defendant $894.00 in damages in the rent eviction action after finding retaliation. It argues that the defendant “had to specifically offer evidence [to] prove damages under ... RSA 540...
8 On December 18, 2018, defendants moved to dismiss Kris’s FHA retaliation