Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Showing 41–60 of 184 results

Section 70-24-202

Worledge v. Riverstone Residential Group, LLC, 2015 MT 142 (2015) Montana state

security deposit provisions in violation of the Security Deposit Act violates the

Section 70-25-201

Summers v. Crestview Apartments, 2010 MT 164 (2010) Montana state

portion of this rent from the security deposit was illegal, the security deposit was less

§ 70-25-202

Duram v. Ploeger, 2017 MT 17N (2017) Montana state

Ploegers constitute the “security deposit.” Duram relies on § 70-25-101(4), MCA, which defines “security deposit” as:

§ 70-25-202

Duram v. Ploeger, 2017 MT 17N (2017) Montana state

...A fee or charge for cleaning and damages, no matter how designated, is presumed to be a security deposit.

§ 70-25-201

Hines v. Topher Realty LLC., 2018 MT 44 (2018) Montana state

¶13 Whether the landlord complied with the requirements of the Montana Residential Tenants’ Security Deposits Act, Title 70, chapter 24, MCA, prior to deducting costs of cleaning from a vacating tenant’s security deposit.

Summers v. Crestview Apartments, 2010 MT 164 (2010)

Summers v. Crestview Apartments, 2010 MT 164 (2010) Montana state

¶17 Crestview could not deduct future rent from the security deposit and withholding accelerated rent from the security deposit was illegal under § 70-25-201(1), MCA.

Section 70-24-202

Worledge v. Riverstone Residential Group, LLC, 2015 MT 142 (2015) Montana state

deposit and provides, “A person may not deduct or withhold from the security deposit

Summers v. Crestview Apartments, 2010 MT 164 (2010)

Summers v. Crestview Apartments, 2010 MT 164 (2010) Montana state

Summers contends that § 70-25-201(4), MCA, prohibits withholding future rent from the security deposit, and the security deposit should have been returned, minus any cleaning deductions, 30 days after termination of the tenancy in October.

Summers v. Crestview Apartments, 2010 MT 164 (2010)

Summers v. Crestview Apartments, 2010 MT 164 (2010) Montana state

¶13 Summers argues that a lease provision permitting Crestview to deduct from the security deposit future damages in the form of accelerated rent is prohibited bylaw. Section 70-25-201(1), MCA, of the Security Deposits Act, provides:

Hines v. Topher Realty LLC., 2018 MT 44 (2018)

Hines v. Topher Realty LLC., 2018 MT 44 (2018) Montana state

Whether the landlord complied with the requirements of the Montana Residential Tenants’ Security Deposits Act, Title 70, chapter 24, MCA, prior to deducting costs of cleaning from a vacating tenant’s security deposit. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Section 70-24-202

Summers v. Crestview Apartments, 2010 MT 164 (2010) Montana state

¶57 Because I would conclude the accelerated rent provision in the lease agreement was conscionable and enforceable, I would also affirm the District Court’s holding which permitted Crestview to deduct accelerated rent from the security deposit. Section 70-25...

§ 70-25-201

Solem v. Chilcote, 906 P.2d 209 (1995) Montana state

tenants' security deposit was wrongfully withheld. Likewise, the

§ 12

Summers v. Crestview Apartments, 2010 MT 164 (2010) Montana state

permitted Crestview to deduct accelerated rent from the security deposit. Section 70-25-

§ 12

Summers v. Crestview Apartments, 2010 MT 164 (2010) Montana state

deduction of accelerated rent from the security deposit because it validly became due,

§ 12

Summers v. Crestview Apartments, 2010 MT 164 (2010) Montana state

201(1), MCA, governs a landlord’s deductions from a tenant’s security deposit:

§ 12

Summers v. Crestview Apartments, 2010 MT 164 (2010) Montana state

from the security deposit any amount for purposes other than those set forth in this

Section 70-24-404

Summers v. Crestview Apartments, 2010 MT 164 (2010) Montana state

from the security deposit; wrongfully imposed an unconscionable and unenforceable

§ 70-25-202

Duram v. Ploeger, 2017 MT 17N (2017) Montana state

constitute the “security deposit,” but the entirety of the damages demanded by the