Showing 41–60 of 100 results
...He alleges the trial court erred in denying this claim because the plain language of section 213.070(2) only required him to prove that Hereford retaliated against him because of his participation in proceedings before the Commission.
On December 18,1990, Keeney filed another complaint with the Commission alleging Hereford terminated his severance payments in retaliation for his filing a charge with the Commission. After receiving his “right to sue” letters from the Commission, Keeney filed a...
Section 213.070(2), RSMo 1994, defines "an unlawful discriminatory practice" to include retaliation against "any other person ... because such person" has filed a complaint under the Missouri Human Rights Act. The issue in this case is whether a former...
Patrick Blanks v. Fluor Corporation 450 S.W.3d 308 Date filed: 2014-09-16 Doctrine: retaliation Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2733178/patrick-blanks-v-fluor-corporation/ --- 010combined by Mooney ---
The Department's Point V contends that the circuit court erroneously submitted the issue of punitive damages to the jury on both of Mignone's retaliation claims.
(2) To retaliate or discriminate in any manner against any other person because such person has opposed any practice prohibited by this chapter or because such person has filed a complaint, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in any...
Chao Vang v. Cher'ron Barney 480 S.W.3d 473 Date filed: 2016-02-02 Doctrine: retaliation Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/3174222/chao-vang-v-cherron-barney/ --- 010combined by Newton ---
SEMO Services, Inc. v. BNSF Railway Company (citation pending) Date filed: 2022-12-13 Doctrine: retaliation Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10630559/semo-services-inc-v-bnsf-railway-company/ --- 010combined by Thomas C. Clark II, J. --- In the Missouri...
Keeney v. Hereford Concrete Products, Inc. 911 S.W.2d 622 Date filed: 1995-12-19 Doctrine: retaliation Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1666983/keeney-v-hereford-concrete-products-inc/ --- 020lead by Robertson ---
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co. 714 S.W.2d 679 Date filed: 1986-06-10 Doctrine: retaliation Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1747893/davis-v-jc-nichols-co/ --- 010combined by Clark --- CLARK, Chief Judge.
Mignone v. Mo. Dep't of Corr. 546 S.W.3d 23 Date filed: 2018-02-06 Doctrine: retaliation Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/6241530/mignone-v-mo-dept-of-corr/ --- 020lead ---
State Ex Rel. Girard v. Percich 557 S.W.2d 25 Date filed: 1977-08-30 Doctrine: retaliation Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1737420/state-ex-rel-girard-v-percich/ --- 010combined by Gunn --- GUNN, Judge.
In its Reply Brief the Department argues that Ellington's testimony bolstered Mignone's retaliation theory that the Department "does not take sexual harassment seriously." We fail to see how Ellington's testimony could have had that effect, however, when...
Central Bank of Kansas City v. Mika 36 S.W.3d 772 Date filed: 2001-01-23 Doctrine: retaliation Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5272474/central-bank-of-kansas-city-v-mika/ --- 020lead by Smart ---
Like in Sparkman , the retaliation claim Mignone submitted in Instruction No. 12 contained multiple factual elements which had to be satisfied with respect to each alleged retaliatory act. For example, as to each act, Mignone had to submit sufficient evidence...
Keeney contends that section 213.070 is sufficiently broad to include any person against whom retaliation occurs as a result of filing a complaint with the Commission, whether or not the person is an employee of the company charged with...
Keeney contends that section 213.070 is sufficiently broad to include any person against whom retaliation occurs as a result of filing a complaint with the Commission, whether or not the person is an employee of the company charged with...
At oral argument the Department argued that, because the various acts of retaliation listed in Instruction No. 12 were submitted in the disjunctive, it was necessary that each individual alleged retaliatory act, considered in isolation, be sufficient to support the...
Dunn v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co. 170 S.W.3d 1 Date filed: 2005-04-12 Doctrine: retaliation Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2352360/dunn-v-enterprise-rent-a-car-co/ --- 010combined by Shaw --- BOOKER T. SHAW, Judge.
The Supreme Court in Keeney went on to specifically hold that a federal requirement that acts of retaliation have a concrete impact on the terms and conditions of a plaintiff's employment did not apply to claims brought under the...