Showing 21–40 of 100 results
42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a) (1988) prohibits employers from retaliating against employees who assert their employment rights.
A retaliation claim is not conditioned on the success of the underlying discrimination or harassment claim. Thus, it is irrelevant to a claim of retaliation that the act complained of was not legally actionable. The only issue is whether the...
to make that claim, that the tenants’ lease was terminated in retaliation for making complaints
security deposit; (4) violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act; (5) harassment; (6) retaliation;
In its final Point, the Department argues that the circuit court erroneously failed to remit the punitive damages award of $1,000,000, which included a $400,000 award on Mignone's retaliation claim for complaining about Fagan's sexual...
The language of section 213.070(2) is clear and unambiguous. The statute renders retaliation “in any manner against any other person” an unlawful discriminatory practice.
The language of section 213.070(2) is clear and unambiguous. The statute renders retaliation "in any manner against any other person" an unlawful discriminatory practice.
...Mignone's claims of retaliation focused on discrete actions taken by the Department, allegedly as reprisals for her complaints of sexual harassment, rather than on the overall work environment created by the Department's actions in the aggregate. Mignone's...
Patrick Blanks v. Fluor Corporation (citation pending) Date filed: 2014-06-17 Doctrine: retaliation Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2678642/patrick-blanks-v-fluor-corporation/ --- 010combined ---
Perkins v. Burks 78 S.W.2d 845 Date filed: 1934-12-21 Doctrine: retaliation Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/3548040/perkins-v-burks/ --- 020lead ---
At oral argument before this Court, Keeney's counsel conceded that the payment agreement was a gratuity. Nonetheless, counsel argued that section 213.070 does not require the existence of a contract before a claim of retaliation can be sustained.
...Nonetheless, counsel argued that section 213.070 does not require the existence of a contract before a claim of retaliation can be sustained.
State v. Brooks 960 S.W.2d 479 Date filed: 1997-12-23 Doctrine: retaliation Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2427881/state-v-brooks/ --- 010combined by Covington --- COVINGTON, Judge.
On December 18, 1990, Keeney filed another complaint with the Commission alleging Hereford terminated his severance payments in retaliation for his filing a charge with the Commission. After receiving his "right to sue" letters from the Commission, Keeney filed a...
Your verdict must be for plaintiff and against defendant on plaintiff's claim of unlawful retaliation if you believe:
42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a) (1988) prohibits employers from retaliating against employees who assert their employment rights.
...The first — that “no contract for the payment of money existed between the Plaintiff and Hereford as pled” — misunderstands the statutory predicate for maintaining an action for retaliation under section 213.070.
...The firstthat "no contract for the payment of money existed between the Plaintiff and Hereford as pled"misunderstands the statutory predicate for maintaining an action for retaliation under section 213.070.
Kulaga v. Kulaga 149 S.W.3d 570 Date filed: 2004-11-23 Doctrine: retaliation Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1792269/kulaga-v-kulaga/ --- 010combined by Breckenridge --- PATRICIA BRECKENRIDGE, Judge.
...With respect to Mignone's first retaliation claim, the jury could find that her transfer out of Housing Unit 6, and the failure to return her to Unit 6, involved trickery and deceit, rather than mere accident. The Department's...