Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Showing 1–20 of 58 results

§ 700

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 700.600 Missouri state

700.600.    Notice required before landlord may evict, when — landlord prohibited from increasing rent, when. — 1.  As used in this section, the following terms mean:

§ 700

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 700.600 Missouri state

...for purposes of providing notice pursuant to this section.  The landlord shall not increase the rent, except for a rent increase based solely on an increase in property taxes, for any tenant of the manufactured or mobile home land lease...

Rathbun v. Cato Corp., 93 S.W.3d 771 (2002)

Rathbun v. Cato Corp., 93 S.W.3d 771 (2002) Missouri state

...Rent that would otherwise be due under the renewals of the Lease would be the increased amounts called for with regard to each such renewal.

Rathbun v. Cato Corp., 93 S.W.3d 771 (2002)

Rathbun v. Cato Corp., 93 S.W.3d 771 (2002) Missouri state

...Rent that would otherwise be due under the renewals of the Lease would be the increased amounts called for with regard to each such renewal.

Section 512

Yes Chancellor Farms, LLC, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Vicki Merkel (2023) Missouri state

Premises. The letter gave notice that the monthly rent was being increased to $444 effective on

Section 512

Yes Chancellor Farms, LLC, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Vicki Merkel (2023) Missouri state

9 were notified that the monthly rent was being increased. See Rule 74.04(c)(2); Frank, 633

State v. Muegge, 842 S.W.2d 192 (1992)

State v. Muegge, 842 S.W.2d 192 (1992) Missouri state

Over the years, Norfolk increased the rent for the leased premises. In 1970, Norfolk raised the rent to $25.00 per year. In 1975, Norfolk raised the rent to $75.00 per year. Finally, in 1990, Norfolk raised the rent...

Section 512

Yes Chancellor Farms, LLC, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Vicki Merkel (2023) Missouri state

January 20, 2022, the Defendants were notified that the monthly rent was being increased to $444.00 effective on March 1, 2022.”

Section 512

Yes Chancellor Farms, LLC, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Vicki Merkel (2023) Missouri state

Vicki Merkel at the Premises. The letter gave notice that the monthly rent was being increased to $444 effective on March 1, 2022. 6

Rathbun v. Cato Corp., 93 S.W.3d 771 (2002)

Rathbun v. Cato Corp., 93 S.W.3d 771 (2002) Missouri state

Lessor’s complaint here is that, by the use of the term “hereafter” in the judgment, the trial court rendered ineffective the provisions of paragraph 6 of the Lease relating to increased rent in the event of *778renewal. It is...

Rathbun v. Cato Corp., 93 S.W.3d 771 (2002)

Rathbun v. Cato Corp., 93 S.W.3d 771 (2002) Missouri state

Lessor's complaint here is that, by the use of the term "hereafter" in the judgment, the trial court rendered ineffective the provisions of paragraph 6 of the Lease relating to increased rent in the event of *778 renewal. It...

Flanagan v. Lazerine, 175 Mo. App. 188 (1913)

Flanagan v. Lazerine, 175 Mo. App. 188 (1913) Missouri state

...134, it appears that besides the defendant’s term expiring and the fact of his holding over and that he did not dissent from the proposed increase of rent, he actually promised to pay it on condition plaintiff would restore...

Ladeas v. Carter, 845 S.W.2d 45 (1992)

Ladeas v. Carter, 845 S.W.2d 45 (1992) Missouri state

The lessees of a motel refused to pay an increase in rent that was due upon the addition of seven rooms to the motel. Id.

Rhoden Investment Co., Inc. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 499 S.W.2d 375 (1973)

Rhoden Investment Co., Inc. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 499 S.W.2d 375 (1973) Missouri state

...premises,” $2,500 per month plus quarterly percentage rentals, during the 30-year term of the demise beginning upon completion of certain construction, with provisions for increases in rent based upon increases in sales. Pertinent provisions of the rider follow:

Flanagan v. Lazerine, 175 Mo. App. 188 (1913)

Flanagan v. Lazerine, 175 Mo. App. 188 (1913) Missouri state

...By Ms continuing- in possession and remaining silent, the landlord! had the right to construe his silence into an assent or acquiescence and hold Mm for the increased rent.” But all of this relates to the statement of fact immediately...

Bryan v. Vaughn, 579 S.W.2d 177 (1979)

Bryan v. Vaughn, 579 S.W.2d 177 (1979) Missouri state

...and the rent under this lease shall be increased by $400.00 per month, to be effective 10 days after the date the units are completed and ready for occupancy. . . .” In addition to the $2,000.00 rent payment per...

Flanagan v. Lazerine, 175 Mo. App. 188 (1913)

Flanagan v. Lazerine, 175 Mo. App. 188 (1913) Missouri state

...Defendant did not accede to this demand for increased rent and continued in possession of the premises as before. Subsequently plaintiff instituted two suits against defendant for such increased rent for September and October, but the finding and judgment in...

Rouse Co. v. Boston Seafood of St. Louis, Inc., 894 S.W.2d 190 (1995)

Rouse Co. v. Boston Seafood of St. Louis, Inc., 894 S.W.2d 190 (1995) Missouri state

...The lease called for the defendant to pay rent at a fixed amount for three years then provided for “step-ups” in the rent thereafter. In 1991, pursuant to one of the step-ups, the rent increased from approximately $10...