MPLP White Bear Lake LLC v. Michael Harvey, John Doe (2024)
5 underlying the retaliation defense took place within 90 days of the landlord’s notice quit.
Showing 61–80 of 128 results
5 underlying the retaliation defense took place within 90 days of the landlord’s notice quit.
II. Did the district court resolve Mac-Atee’s unlawful-retaliation claim? ANALYSIS I.
Applying the most reasonable interpretation to the facts of this case, Olson did not have a defense of retaliation under section 504B.441. Nothing in the record shows that Olson ever filed a complaint with a housing inspector. He did...
a presumption of retaliation which the landlord must rebut if the notice to quit was served within 90 days of the tenant’s protected activity.
Olson v. Bowen 192 N.W.2d 188 Date filed: 1971-11-19 Doctrine: retaliation Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1592631/olson-v-bowen/ --- 010combined --- Per Curiam.
...Stat. § 504B.441 (2018), and decide whether a residential tenant must file a civil complaint commencing a judicial proceeding in order for the retaliation defense set out in section 504B.441 to apply. The majority holds that a complaint commencing...
Tenants defended the action on the ground that the attempted eviction was in retaliation for their good-faith activities undertaken to obtain repairs within the meaning of Minn. St. 566.03, subd. 2. 3
and that Hook & Ladder brought the eviction action in retaliation for her complaints about
address Nalewaja’s retaliation defense. The court of appeals remanded the case on that
because the landlord continued to accept rent for five months). But even when retaliation
consider the non-waiver clause, as well as Nalewaja’s retaliation defense. See Hook &
The issue arises out of the court’s disposition of defendants’ claim that the eviction was without good cause and motivated by a desire to retaliate for defendant Jack Bowen’s political activities within the *547
Before turning to section 504B.441, it is helpful to review the retaliation defenses codified by the Legislature. Section 504B.285, subdivision 2, makes a retaliation defense available "following the alleged termination of a tenancy by notice to quit " if...
...In section 504B.385, the Legislature declares that the retaliation protections of section 504B.441 "appl[y] to proceedings under" section 504B.385. That proceedings under section 504B.385 include things different than proceedings under section 504B.441 says nothing...
Did the district court properly apply the jury's retaliation finding to grant possession to the tenant rather than the landlord in this breach-of-lease eviction action? ANALYSIS
For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the court of appeals' decision holding that Olson could not assert a statutory defense, but we reverse the court of appeals' decision on the issue of a retaliation defense at common law. Affirmed in...
Central Housing argues that the district court misapplied the law when it relied on the jury's retaliation finding to deny Central Housing possession after its eviction action. We review a district court's application of the law de novo...
materially breached her lease by breaking and entering into the utlilty closet, but did not address the retaliation argument.
Ladder Apartments, 2024 WL 3324809, at *7 (remanding to the district court to consider Nalewaja’s retaliation defense). 13 CONCLUSION
The Obermollers contend the Bank vindictively instituted foreclosure proceedings as a reprisal and argue they are entitled to assert “retaliation” as a defense under section 566.03.