Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Showing 61–80 of 128 results

Section 504B

Cent. Hous. Assocs., LP v. Olson, 929 N.W.2d 398 (2019) Minnesota state

Applying the most reasonable interpretation to the facts of this case, Olson did not have a defense of retaliation under section 504B.441. Nothing in the record shows that Olson ever filed a complaint with a housing inspector. He did...

Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)

Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976) Minnesota state

a presumption of retaliation which the landlord must rebut if the notice to quit was served within 90 days of the tenant’s protected activity.

Olson v. Bowen, 192 N.W.2d 188 (1971)

Olson v. Bowen, 192 N.W.2d 188 (1971) Minnesota state

Olson v. Bowen 192 N.W.2d 188 Date filed: 1971-11-19 Doctrine: retaliation Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1592631/olson-v-bowen/ --- 010combined --- Per Curiam.

Section 504B

Cent. Hous. Assocs., LP v. Olson, 929 N.W.2d 398 (2019) Minnesota state

...Stat. § 504B.441 (2018), and decide whether a residential tenant must file a civil complaint commencing a judicial proceeding in order for the retaliation defense set out in section 504B.441 to apply. The majority holds that a complaint commencing...

Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)

Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976) Minnesota state

Tenants defended the action on the ground that the attempted eviction was in retaliation for their good-faith activities undertaken to obtain repairs within the meaning of Minn. St. 566.03, subd. 2. 3

Olson v. Bowen, 192 N.W.2d 188 (1971)

Olson v. Bowen, 192 N.W.2d 188 (1971) Minnesota state

The issue arises out of the court’s disposition of defendants’ claim that the eviction was without good cause and motivated by a desire to retaliate for defendant Jack Bowen’s political activities within the *547

Cent. Hous. Assocs., LP v. Olson, 929 N.W.2d 398 (2019)

Cent. Hous. Assocs., LP v. Olson, 929 N.W.2d 398 (2019) Minnesota state

Before turning to section 504B.441, it is helpful to review the retaliation defenses codified by the Legislature. Section 504B.285, subdivision 2, makes a retaliation defense available "following the alleged termination of a tenancy by notice to quit " if...

Section 504B

Cent. Hous. Assocs., LP v. Olson, 929 N.W.2d 398 (2019) Minnesota state

...In section 504B.385, the Legislature declares that the retaliation protections of section 504B.441 "appl[y] to proceedings under" section 504B.385. That proceedings under section 504B.385 include things different than proceedings under section 504B.441 says nothing...

Cent. Hous. Assocs., LP v. Olson, 910 N.W.2d 485 (2018)

Cent. Hous. Assocs., LP v. Olson, 910 N.W.2d 485 (2018) Minnesota state

Did the district court properly apply the jury's retaliation finding to grant possession to the tenant rather than the landlord in this breach-of-lease eviction action? ANALYSIS

Section 504B

Cent. Hous. Assocs., LP v. Olson, 929 N.W.2d 398 (2019) Minnesota state

For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the court of appeals' decision holding that Olson could not assert a statutory defense, but we reverse the court of appeals' decision on the issue of a retaliation defense at common law. Affirmed in...

Cent. Hous. Assocs., LP v. Olson, 910 N.W.2d 485 (2018)

Cent. Hous. Assocs., LP v. Olson, 910 N.W.2d 485 (2018) Minnesota state

Central Housing argues that the district court misapplied the law when it relied on the jury's retaliation finding to deny Central Housing possession after its eviction action. We review a district court's application of the law de novo...