Showing 21–40 of 211 results
had not returned the $38,000 security deposit refund despite receiving more than
of course, Elevate never attempted to recoup its security deposit by withholding rent
as a security deposit refund constituted a material breach of the agreement. Both
The tenants moved for summary judgment on their security-deposit and bad-
The District of Columbia’s Security Deposit Act provides that, within forty-
frivolous or unfounded refusal to return a security deposit . . . motivated by a
Elevate sent a letter requesting that Hto7 refund one-third of its security deposit,
breach of contract, seeking the $38,000 security deposit refund that it had never
security deposit was a material breach “involv[es] an inquiry into such matters as
and costs accrued during the protracted legal battle to recover their security deposit.
he paid for necessary repairs in excess of the security deposit amount. The
unreimbursed security deposit, and $10,000 in damages for Mr. Pourbabai’s bad
refund the $38,000 portion of its security deposit, nothing in the No Rental Offset
the event the security deposit refund was not timely. But the point cuts the other
[3] Kirkendall also alleged that Temple demanded a security deposit of one and one-half times one month's rent in violation of the law. Security Deposit Act, D.C. Law 1-48, § 3(b), 1976 D.C. Stat. 13...
refund their security deposit. He also contests the court’s rulings denying his motion
Mr. Pourbabai’s intent to apply the security deposit “toward covering a fraction of
his portion of the security deposit and treble damages on the grounds that Mr.
$38,000 of Elevate’s security deposit, but that it would do so only if Elevate
...Oliver refused to allow him access to his room or his property, and again refused to return his $400 security deposit. Without the security deposit, Mr. Mustafa lacked the funds to obtain other housing, and was thus homeless for three...