Showing 21–40 of 98 results
...No landlord shall increase the rent due from a tenant because of the requirement that the landlord pay on interest the security deposit.
“(2) Any such tenant aggrieved by a rent increase or proposed rent increase may file a complaint with the fair rent commission, if any, for the town, city or borough where his dwelling unit is located; or, if no such...
“(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of section 47a-20, a landlord may increase the rent of a tenant if: (1) The condition complained of was caused by the lack of due care by the tenant or another person of Ms household...
“(c) (1) The rent of a tenant protected by this section may be increased only to the extent that such increase is fair and equitable, based on the criteria set forth in section 7-148c.
...In May, 1978, the landlord gave the tenant notice of an increase in rent to $260 per month commencing in June. The tenant neither paid the increased rent in June nor tendered any of the old rent. No rent has...
rent common expenses, in accordance with subsection (b) of section 47-76, to the extent not already included in the rent. Any such lessee aggrieved by such an increase may submit his complaint to the fair rent commission of the...
...The parties agreed on an initial rent of $250 a month until the defendants completed repairs within approximately three months, after which the parties agreed that the rent would increase and rent subsidies would supplement the plaintiffs’ payments.
May 1, the plaintiff notified the defendants by letter that the amount of the increased rent beginning June 1 could not be determined until later when the index had been published, and that the plaintiff would send notice of the...
"(D) Failure by the resident to agree to a proposed rent increase, provided the owner has complied with all provisions of subdivision (5) of this subsection; or
...The court found that the defendant Bixford Martin, acting on behalf of all three of the defendants, orally agreed to a $41 per month increase in the rent. The court concluded, therefore, that the rent due for August, 1982, was...
It should be noted that the defendants at no time refused to pay the increased rent. Their reply to the plaintiff’s letter of September 4 stated that the rent would be paid as soon as the plaintiff responded to...
On September 5, the defendants sent a letter to the plaintiff in New York expressing concern about the amount of the rent increase. The next day they received a letter from the plaintiff dated September 4 stating that unless the...
On September 5, the defendants sent a letter to the plaintiff in New York expressing concern about the amount of the rent increase. The next day they received a letter from the plaintiff dated September 4 stating that unless the...
...A contested issue is whether the lease makes a default in the tenant’s obligation to reimburse the landlord for increases in insurance premiums, as well as for increases in real estate taxes, the equivalent of a default in rent...
It should be noted that the defendants at no time refused to pay the increased rent. Their reply to the plaintiff's letter of September 4 stated that the rent would be paid as soon as the plaintiff responded to...
...On *Page 821 May 1, the plaintiff notified the defendants by letter that the amount of the increased rent beginning June 1 could not be determined until later when the index had been published, and that the plaintiff would send...
...Section 47a-20 was enacted pursuant to a 1971 public act entitled “An Act Prohibiting Retaliatory Rent Increases and Evictions.” Public Acts 1971, No. 71-852. Senator Wilber G. Smith introduced the legislation and explained: “[T]he purpose of the...
In this summary process action, the plaintiff seeks to evict the defendant for failure to pay increases in real estate taxes and insurance premiums. According to the complaint, such defaults are to be treated as defaults in rent pursuant to...
...Since the defendant’s base rent is only $550 per month, the payment of the increases in real estate taxes, as required by the lease, should have been accomplished. B
same thing, basically that as of June 1, 2024 the rent would be increasing to either:$6,500 per month or $6,510 per month. ! Second, the underlying judgment was based on the defendants’