Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Showing 1–20 of 128 results

Cal. Civ. Code § 1946.2

Cal. Civ. Code § 1946.2 California state

...could continue living in the residential real property without violating health, safety, and habitability codes and laws. Cosmetic improvements alone, including painting, decorating, and minor repairs, or other work that can be performed safely without having the residential real property...

§ 17200

Peviani v. Arbors at California Oaks Property Owner (2021) California state

buildings in a condition that make them fit for human habitation and to “ ‘repair all

§ 17200

Peviani v. Arbors at California Oaks Property Owner (2021) California state

habitability, negligence, public nuisance, and fraud in the existence of these conditions and failure to repair them.” b. Nuisance i. Procedural History

Section 1803

1041 20TH St., LLC v. Santa Monica Rent Control Bd., 250 Cal. Rptr. 3d 376 (2019) California state

...The staff report found that the 20th Street property was uninhabitable, the costs for repairs to bring the building to a habitable condition exceeded the maximum collectable rent, and the owner would not be able to repair the property to...

Section 1941

Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981) California state

...First, in defining the warranty we repeatedly spoke in terms of maintaining the leased premises, duty to maintain habitable premises or duty to repair rather than a duty to construct new improvements. (E.g., 10 Cal.3d at pp. 623...

Section 1941

Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981) California state

...First, in defining the warranty we repeatedly spoke in terms of maintaining the leased premises, duty to maintain habitable premises or duty to repair rather than a duty to construct new improvements. (E.g., 10 Cal.3d at pp. 623...

Section 1942

Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981) California state

...s breach of the implied warranty of habitability exists whether or not he has had a “reasonable” time to repair. Otherwise, the mutual dependence of a landlord’s obligation to maintain habitable premises, and of a tenant’s duty to...

Section 1942

Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981) California state

...s breach of the implied warranty of habitability exists whether or not he has had a "reasonable" time to repair. Otherwise, the mutual dependence of a landlord's obligation to maintain habitable premises, and of a tenant's duty to...

Section 1803

1041 20TH St., LLC v. Santa Monica Rent Control Bd., 250 Cal. Rptr. 3d 376 (2019) California state

...The repairs necessary for habitability cannot be completed in an economically feasible manner."

1041 20th Street v. Santa Monica Rent Control Bd. (2019)

1041 20th Street v. Santa Monica Rent Control Bd. (2019) California state

6 uninhabitable, the costs for repairs to bring the building to a habitable condition exceeded the maximum collectable rent, and the owner would not be able to repair the property to habitability in an economically feasible manner. At the hearing...

Section 1941

Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981) California state

...landlord's breach of implied warranty of habitability by (1) continuing to live in premises despite knowledge of the defects or (2) failing to allow a landlord a reasonable time to repair before withholding rent. There is the additional question...

Section 1942

Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981) California state

...1941.1 of the Civil Code do not apply because the defendants used the breach of the implied warranty of habitability as a defense rather than using the statutory remedy of “repair and deduct” as set forth in section 1942.

Section 669

Stoiber v. Honeychuck, 101 Cal. App. 3d 903 (1980) California state

In reaching a decision whether the tenant's action sounding in contract for breach of the warranty of habitability is the only remedy available against a landlord for failure to repair and maintain the premises in a habitable condition, we...

Section 1942

Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981) California state

...1941.1 of the Civil Code do not apply because the defendants used the breach of the implied warranty of habitability as a defense rather than using the statutory remedy of "repair and deduct" as set forth in section 1942.

Green v. Superior Court, 517 P.2d 1168 (1974)

Green v. Superior Court, 517 P.2d 1168 (1974) California state

The “repair and deduct’ remedy of section 1941 et seq. of the Civil Code was not intended as the exclusive remedy for tenants in this field and does not preclude the recognition of a common law warranty of habitability.

Green v. Superior Court, 517 P.2d 1168 (1974)

Green v. Superior Court, 517 P.2d 1168 (1974) California state

...Civil Code foreclose this court from adopting a common law implied waranty of habitability. In general, these sections place a statutory duty of maintenance and repair upon lessors of residential property and authorize a tenant, after giving reasonable notice of...

Green v. Superior Court, 517 P.2d 1168 (1974)

Green v. Superior Court, 517 P.2d 1168 (1974) California state

...287; Moskovitz, Rent Withholding and the Implied Warranty of Habitability (1970) 4 Clearinghouse Rev. 49; Note, Repairing the Duty to Repair (1971) 11 Santa Clara Law. 298.) 8

Stoiber v. Honeychuck, 101 Cal. App. 3d 903 (1980)

Stoiber v. Honeychuck, 101 Cal. App. 3d 903 (1980) California state

In reaching a decision whether the tenant’s action sounding in contract for breach of the warranty of habitability is the only remedy available against a landlord for failure to repair and maintain the premises in a habitable condition, we...

Green v. Superior Court, 517 P.2d 1168 (1974)

Green v. Superior Court, 517 P.2d 1168 (1974) California state

...through which they might gain express warranties of habitability from landlords, and thus the mechanism of the “free market” no longer serves as a viable means for fairly allocating the duty to repair leased premises between landlord and tenant. 9

Moriarty v. Laramar Mgmt. Corp. (2014)

Moriarty v. Laramar Mgmt. Corp. (2014) California state

...15 specific wrongs by defendants, including failing to provide a habitable dwelling; failing to maintain and repair plumbing fixtures; allowing water intrusion and failing to rectify it; failing to repair multiple sources of water intrusion and remediate development of airborne...