Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Showing 61–80 of 497 results

§ 17200

Peviani v. Arbors at California Oaks Property Owner (2021) California state

a policy of applying improper charges to security deposits regardless of cleanliness or

§ 17200

Peviani v. Arbors at California Oaks Property Owner (2021) California state

roommate paid a security deposit of $425. The dumpsters overflowed and smelled bad.

§ 17200

Peviani v. Arbors at California Oaks Property Owner (2021) California state

all of the $425 security deposit and billed Mendez $528. An itemized statement

§ 17200

Peviani v. Arbors at California Oaks Property Owner (2021) California state

Moving to the security deposit class, defendants asserted that the law required an

§ 17200

Peviani v. Arbors at California Oaks Property Owner (2021) California state

by denying certification of the advertising and habitability class. C. SECURITY DEPOSIT CLASS

§ 17200

Peviani v. Arbors at California Oaks Property Owner (2021) California state

primary question for the security deposit class, in regard to commonality for class

§ 17200

Peviani v. Arbors at California Oaks Property Owner (2021) California state

defendants who bear the burden of proving the reasonableness of their security deposit

§ 17200

Peviani v. Arbors at California Oaks Property Owner (2021) California state

have refunded a security deposit to her; (2) Lubbock did not document preexisting

section 1951

250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005) California state

section 1951.7, subdivision (a), which defines an “advance payment” under a lease as “moneys” deposited with the landlord to secure performance of the lease, or other payment that is the “substantial equivalent” of such a deposit. 250 thus submits...

People Ex Rel. Smith v. Parkmerced Co., 198 Cal. App. 3d 683 (1988)

People Ex Rel. Smith v. Parkmerced Co., 198 Cal. App. 3d 683 (1988) California state

...the primary function of which is to secure the execution of a rental agreement. . . . [¶] This bill would define security as inclusive of any payment, fee, deposit, or charge, thereby eliminating the distinction between payments or deposits based upon their primary...

section 6

250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005) California state

...44, 47, italics added.) Moreover, if 250’s construction of section 1950.7 were adopted, landlords could retain security deposits well beyond the statutory deadline in every case, on the ground that the deposit “might” not cover prospective damages, and...

Section 31

250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005) California state

premiums, and a class of former tenants sued for return of those premiums on the ground that they were security deposits within the meaning of section 1950.5. Under section 1950.5 the landlord was required, within three weeks of...

§ 17200

Peviani v. Arbors at California Oaks Property Owner (2021) California state

A landlord may use a security deposit to pay for repairing “damages to the

§ 17200

Peviani v. Arbors at California Oaks Property Owner (2021) California state

tenant’s security deposit to repair any conditions that preexisted the tenant’s occupancy

§ 17200

Peviani v. Arbors at California Oaks Property Owner (2021) California state

the security deposit in violation of the foregoing law may subject the landlord “to

§ 17200

Peviani v. Arbors at California Oaks Property Owner (2021) California state

The elements of an action for wrongful retention of a security deposit under Civil

§ 17200

Peviani v. Arbors at California Oaks Property Owner (2021) California state

In its ruling, the trial court denied class certification for the security deposit class

§ 17200

Peviani v. Arbors at California Oaks Property Owner (2021) California state

that defendants took a pet odor deduction from her security deposit despite her not

Granberry v. Islay Investments, 161 Cal. App. 3d 382 (1984)

Granberry v. Islay Investments, 161 Cal. App. 3d 382 (1984) California state

The original version of Civil Code section 1950.5 defined security as “any payment or deposit of money the primary function of which is to secure the performance of a rental agreement or any part of such an agreement, . . . made...

section 1951

250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005) California state

...waivers of section 1950.5’s protections for residential security deposits (§ 1953, subd. (a)(1)), its failure to do so with respect to commercial security deposits indicates that waivers are permissible as to those deposits. (See Hersh v. State Bar