Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Showing 21–40 of 637 results

Johnson v. Housing Authority of City of Oakland (2019)

Johnson v. Housing Authority of City of Oakland (2019) California state

6 Johnson was evicted for committing serious and/or repeated violations of the lease (24 C.F.R. § 982.552(b)(2)). The notice explained, “You violated the family obligations by committing serious and/or repeated violations of your lease...

Section 425

Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011) California state

Furthermore, as a matter of law, Wallace and Owen have no cause of action against defendants for wrongful eviction based on the unlawful detainer action or three-day notice, in light of the litigation privilege of Civil Code section 47...

San Francisco Apartment Assn. v. City and County of San Francisco (2018)

San Francisco Apartment Assn. v. City and County of San Francisco (2018) California state

...The ordinance in that case “require[d] that tenants be provided notice and an opportunity to cure any offending conduct before a landlord may resort to eviction. Where an eviction is brought due to a tenant’s substantial violation of...

Section 8

Johnson v. Hous. Auth. of Oakland, 250 Cal. Rptr. 3d 686 (2019) California state

...The notice explained, "You violated the family obligations by committing serious and/or repeated violations of your lease agreement, failing to submit the eviction notices within 5 days, and failing to provide additional information necessary to administer the section 8...

Section 425

1100 PARK LANE ASSOCIATES v. Feldman, 74 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1 (2008) California state

Service of the notice to quit was a prelitigation communication. “A notice of eviction is a communication regarding prospective litigation, and, as such, it is not necessarily part of a judicial proceeding. [Citations.]” {Action Apartment, supra,

S.F. Apartment Ass'n v. City & Cnty. of S.F., 229 Cal. Rptr. 3d 124 (2018)

S.F. Apartment Ass'n v. City & Cnty. of S.F., 229 Cal. Rptr. 3d 124 (2018) California state

...The ordinance in that case "require[d] that tenants be provided notice and an opportunity to cure any offending conduct before a landlord may resort to eviction. Where an eviction is brought due to a tenant's substantial violation of...

Elmassian v. Flores (2021)

Elmassian v. Flores (2021) California state

3 three-day notice or even to any testimony that it constituted an eviction-supporting nuisance on the property.

Apartment Assn. of Los Angeles etc. v. City of Los Angeles (2026)

Apartment Assn. of Los Angeles etc. v. City of Los Angeles (2026) California state

...245-246.) The Pasadena notice and cure provisions were similar to those rejected in SFAA 2024, supra, 104 Cal.App.5th 1218. That case examined an ordinance that created a longer notice timeline for landlords pursuing at-fault evictions and...

Cal. Apartment Assn. v. City of Pasadena (2025)

Cal. Apartment Assn. v. City of Pasadena (2025) California state

...That ordinance required that for certain at-fault evictions, a landlord “ ‘shall prior to serving the [statutory] notice to vacate provide the tenant a written warning and an opportunity to cure.’ ” (Id. at p. 1225.) Further, it stated these grounds...

Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)

Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005) California state

On August 21, 2003, Bohbot served Cope with a second notice to quit, intending to start the owner-occupancy eviction proceedings again. Cope’s attorney responded by letter asserting the notice to quit was invalid under the Board’s regulation...

Lincoln Place Tenants Ass'n v. City of Los Angeles, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 120 (2007)

Lincoln Place Tenants Ass'n v. City of Los Angeles, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 120 (2007) California state

seeking to compel the City to comply with the mitigation measures adopted under CEQA in the VTT, and to enjoin AIMCO from evicting the remaining tenants from Lincoln Place. The petition alleged that AIMCO’s eviction notices constituted an unfair...

Cal. Apartment Assn. v. City of Pasadena (2025)

Cal. Apartment Assn. v. City of Pasadena (2025) California state

20 Petitioners challenge only the notice requirement’s effect on the timelines for eviction procedures and do not raise a preemption challenge to the required content of a Written Notice to Cease under section 1803(cc).

2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)

2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022) California state

...Under plaintiffs’ view, although a local ordinance may validly require notice and reasonable relocation assistance payments in evictions under the Act, failure to comply with those requirements could not be a defense to summary eviction. Plaintiffs suggest that tenants could...

§ 1085

Cardenas v. Noren, 235 Cal. App. 3d 1344 (1991) California state

...652].) One evicted from his home by a writ of possession against another receives no notice and no hearing, and such an eviction violates fundamental constitutional principles. (Arrieta, supra, 31 Cal.3d at p. 389.) *1349 The procedures contemplated by...

Boshernitsan v. Bach (2021)

Boshernitsan v. Bach (2021) California state

11The quoted language is from the portion of the notice of termination addressing how to notify the landlord of possible protection from eviction. The portion of the notice of termination addressing how to claim an additional relocation payment states that...

2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)

2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022) California state

...The landlord obviously is not required to advise a tenant who is being evicted what rights other hypothetical occupants would have if they were being evicted. Thus, the notice defendants received was in full, or “strict,” compliance with the statute...

Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010)

Chacon v. Litke, 181 Cal. App. 4th 1234 (2010) California state

include filing a lawsuit to recover possession (such as service of an eviction notice with no intent to proceed to litigation, or constructive eviction by failure to provide heat), or that arise from a landlord’s conduct after recovery of...

Boston LLC v. Juarez (2015)

Boston LLC v. Juarez (2015) California state

...In evictions based on three-day notices to perform or quit, as in the present case, breaches would only constitute valid grounds for eviction if they were not cured within the notice period, meaning tenants could not be evicted based...

Section 1942

Winslett v. 1811 27th Ave., LLC, 237 Cal. Rptr. 3d 25 (2018) California state

...1249-1250, 63 Cal.Rptr.3d 398, 163 P.3d 89.) But to the extent the ordinance covers prelitigation service of an eviction notice (malicious " 'service of any notice to quit or other eviction notice ' "), it conflicts with the litigation...

Bisno v. DOUGLAS EMMETT REALTY FUND 1988, 174 Cal. App. 4th 1534 (2009)

Bisno v. DOUGLAS EMMETT REALTY FUND 1988, 174 Cal. App. 4th 1534 (2009) California state

...section 1806 eviction notices and C.A. section 1809 excess rent demands. Bisno contends those communications do not qualify for the privilege if the landlord was not in good faith contemplating litigation when he served the eviction notice or made...