Layes v. RHP Properties, Inc. (2019)

Citation: Layes v. RHP Properties, Inc. (2019)
Parent Document: Layes v. RHP Properties, Inc. (2019)
Jurisdiction: Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date: 2019-08-28
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4657186/layes-v-rhp-properties-inc/ ↗

Full Text

894 chars

16On August 29, 2016, the Attorney General's Office sent a
letter to the CC park manager, instructing RHP Properties to
stop enforcing the November, 2015, version of the CC park rules,
which had never been submitted for the Attorney General's
approval as required by G. L. c. 140, § 32L (5). See 940 Code
Mass. Regs. § 10.02(4) (making it an unfair or deceptive act or
practice for park operators to enforce unapproved rules). The
letter indicated that the 2015 CC park rule required residents
to maintain and to replace their above-ground oil tanks and that
the rule violated the Attorney General's regulations; further,
the letter requested that RHP Properties assume the maintenance
duties required by the regulations. When the defendants failed
to respond, the Attorney General's Office reiterated the
position and the requests in a follow-up letter sent to RHP
Properties' Michigan office.

Other Sections in This Document (524)

Full Text