Jablonski v. Casey, 64 Mass. App. Ct. 744 (2005)
- Citation
- Jablonski v. Casey, 64 Mass. App. Ct. 744 (2005)
- Parent Document
- Jablonski v. Casey, 64 Mass. App. Ct. 744 (2005)
- Jurisdiction
- Massachusetts (state)
- Effective Date
- 2005-10-13
Other Sections in This Document (21)
- Jablonski v. Casey, 64 Mass. App. Ct. 744 (2005)
- Jablonski v. Casey, 64 Mass. App. Ct. 744 (2005)
- Jablonski v. Casey, 64 Mass. App. Ct. 744 (2005)
- Jablonski v. Casey, 64 Mass. App. Ct. 744 (2005)
- Jablonski v. Casey, 64 Mass. App. Ct. 744 (2005)
- Jablonski v. Casey, 64 Mass. App. Ct. 744 (2005)
- Jablonski v. Casey, 64 Mass. App. Ct. 744 (2005)
- Jablonski v. Casey, 64 Mass. App. Ct. 744 (2005)
- Jablonski v. Casey, 64 Mass. App. Ct. 744 (2005)
- Jablonski v. Casey, 64 Mass. App. Ct. 744 (2005)
- Jablonski v. Casey, 64 Mass. App. Ct. 744 (2005)
- Jablonski v. Casey, 64 Mass. App. Ct. 744 (2005)
- Jablonski v. Casey, 64 Mass. App. Ct. 744 (2005)
- Jablonski v. Casey, 64 Mass. App. Ct. 744 (2005)
- Jablonski v. Casey, 64 Mass. App. Ct. 744 (2005)
- Jablonski v. Casey, 64 Mass. App. Ct. 744 (2005)
- Jablonski v. Casey, 64 Mass. App. Ct. 744 (2005)
- Jablonski v. Casey, 64 Mass. App. Ct. 744 (2005)
- Jablonski v. Casey, 64 Mass. App. Ct. 744 (2005)
- Jablonski v. Casey, 64 Mass. App. Ct. 744 (2005)
- Jablonski v. Casey, 64 Mass. App. Ct. 744 (2005)
Full Text
846 charsTrainor, J. The landlord, H. Frank Jablonski and Barbara Jablonski, doing business as York Properties (York), brought a summary process action in the Quincy Division of the District Court Department based on nonpayment of rent. The tenant, Renate Casey, answered and counterclaimed that York had breached the warranty of habitability and the covenant of quiet *745enjoyment by failing to repair certain conditions in the premises. She also claimed retaliatory eviction and violation of G. L. c. 93A. Following a trial, the judge found in favor of York and entered judgment for possession and back rent. The judge also found in favor of York on Casey’s counterclaims. Casey moved to amend the judgment, pursuant to G. L. c. 239, § 8A, to permit her to pay the back rent into the court and avoid the judgment for possession. That motion was denied.