Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Korens v. R. W. Zukin Corp., 212 Cal. App. 3d 1054 (1989)

Citation
Korens v. R. W. Zukin Corp., 212 Cal. App. 3d 1054 (1989)
Parent Document
Korens v. R. W. Zukin Corp., 212 Cal. App. 3d 1054 (1989)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
1989-08-02

Other Sections in This Document (52)

Full Text

615 chars
One month later Zukin and Beach Park moved for summary judgment, arguing that there was no legal or contractual duty to pay interest on the security deposit. They supported the motion with excerpts from Korens’s deposition and a declaration of Zukin’s president. Korens sought a delay in the hearing of the motion, on the grounds that discovery was not complete, and opposed the motion on the merits. Korens also filed written evidentiary objections to the declaration of Zukin’s president, primarily disputing the competency of the declarant based upon lack of personal knowledge of the facts to which he attested.