It was the function of the board, exclusively confided to it by • the legislature, to determine whether an occasion existed for the exercise of the power set in motion by its order, and having so determined, the court will not assume to reverse its action, unless it appears that such action has been arbitrary, oppressive or repugnant to justice. The plaintiff contends, however, that she was entitled to notice of the proceedings, and to be heard upon the question before it was found against her, and that, as she had neither, she has been deprived of her property without due process of law in violation of constitutional guaranty, and is, therefore, entitled to the protection of the court against an unwarrantable invasion of her right. This claim, however, is unsupported by authority. Health Dept. v. Rector, etc., 145 N. Y. 32; People ex rel. Copcutt v. Board of Health, 140. id. 1; Fire Dept. v. Gilmour, 149 id. 453, 459.