Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 315223.cor.pdf

Citation: Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 315223.cor.pdf
Jurisdiction: Washington (state)
Source verification: official_capture_completeness_unverified
Original Source: https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/315223.cor.pdf ↗

Related Parts of This Source

Full Text

1,076 chars

points to the fact that the district did not immediately take legal action to stop the union's

objectionable course of action. For the district to protect its interests by responding to

correspondence from the AAA during the short period of time before it filed its request

for injunctive relief did not operate as a waiver. Cf River House Dev., Inc. v. Integrus

Architecture, PS, 167 Wn. App. 221, 237, 272 P.3d 289 (2012) (party waived right to

arbitrate by attending in-person status conference, agreeing to trial schedule and date,

24
             

No. 31522-3-111
Spokane Sch. Dist. No. 81 v. Spokane Educ. Ass 'n

exchanging pretrial report, serving and responding to formal discovery including to argue

motions to compel, and represented to court that it was preparing for trial).

Affirmed.

A majority of the panel has determined that this opinion will not be printed in the

Washington Appellate Reports but it will be filed for public record pursuant to RCW

2.06.040.

WE CONCUR:

Brown, 1.

25