Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Apartment Assn. of Los Angeles etc. v. City of Los Angeles (2026)

Citation
Apartment Assn. of Los Angeles etc. v. City of Los Angeles (2026)
Parent Document
Apartment Assn. of Los Angeles etc. v. City of Los Angeles (2026)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2026-05-14

Other Sections in This Document (77)

Full Text

839 chars
11
171 Cal.App.4th 741, 762-763 (Rental Housing).) “When
municipalities enact measures that impose procedural barriers to
the state statutory scheme for summary eviction proceedings,
those measures are preempted.” (Pasadena, supra,
117 Cal.App.5th at p. 241; see Birkenfeld, supra, 17 Cal.3d at
pp. 149, 151; SFAA 2024, supra, 104 Cal.App.5th at pp. 1237-
1238; see generally Chevron, supra, 15 Cal.5th at p. 142 [if local
legislation conflicts with state law, “ ‘ “it is preempted by such
law and void” ’ ”].) AAGLA argues that the Eviction Threshold
Ordinance contradicts and is preempted by the Unlawful
Detainer Act because it imposes an improper procedural
limitation on the three-day notice period required under Code of
Civil Procedure section 1161, subdivision (2), before a landlord
may pursue an eviction for nonpayment of rent.