Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Vaughn v. Hugo Neu Proler International, 223 Cal. App. 3d 1612 (1990)

Citation
Vaughn v. Hugo Neu Proler International, 223 Cal. App. 3d 1612 (1990)
Parent Document
Vaughn v. Hugo Neu Proler International, 223 Cal. App. 3d 1612 (1990)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
1990-09-25

Other Sections in This Document (58)

Full Text

392 chars
Defendants argue that since the Unruh Civil Rights Act does not specifically provide for a cause of action for retaliation they can discriminate against plaintiff by excluding her from the same privileges as the general public. California “courts have not hesitated to prohibit retaliatory exercises of broad private powers when they interfere with public policy” (Schweiger v. Superior Court