DHI Cherry Glen Associates, L.People v. Gutierrez (2020)

Citation: DHI Cherry Glen Associates, L.People v. Gutierrez (2020)
Parent Document: DHI Cherry Glen Associates, L.People v. Gutierrez (2020)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2020-03-16
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4736378/dhi-cherry-glen-associates-lpeo... ↗

Full Text

1,372 chars

-3-
          2. Plaintiff’s counsel showed Ms. Powell Plaintiff’s Exhibit 1, the lease agreement, which
             she identified as Ms. Gutierrez’ lease. Exhibit 1 was offered into evidence.
          3. Ms. Gutierrez’ counsel did not object to its entry into evidence.
          4. She testified that she is manager of Cherry Glen Apartments and the agent for the
             owner.
          5. She testified that she served Heather Gutierrez with the 10-day Notice to Pay Rent
             (Plaintiff’s Exhibit 2).
          6. She authenticated the 10-Day Notice that she signed and attached to the complaint.
          7. Ms. Gutierrez’ counsel did not object to its entry into evidence.
          8. Ms. Gutierrez’ counsel examined Ms. Powell.
          9. She testified that the premises are Project-Based Section 8 Housing.
          The Court found, as provided in its statement of decision, that the 10-day notice to pay
rent or quit conformed to the strict requirements provided in Code of Civil Procedure section
1161 and provided the bases for its finding in favor of respondent. The statement of decision
states:
                 The Honorable Thomas E. Warriner presiding, having considered
                 argument of counsel, as well as oral and documentary evidence, at
                 trial on December 10, 2018 in this matter, finds as follows;

Other Sections in This Document (29)

Full Text