Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Banuelos v. LA Investment CA2/1, 219 Cal. App. 4th 323 (2013)

Citation
Banuelos v. LA Investment CA2/1, 219 Cal. App. 4th 323 (2013)
Parent Document
Banuelos v. LA Investment CA2/1, 219 Cal. App. 4th 323 (2013)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2013-09-03

Full Text

394 chars
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County.
Rose Hom, Judge. Reversed in part; affirmed in part.
        Law Office of Spix & Martin, Richard L. Spix and D. Elizabeth Martin for
Plaintiff and Appellant.
        Law Offices of Douglas W. Beck & Associates and Douglas W. Beck for
Defendants and Respondents.
                   ____________________________________________