Section failing to provide owner with opportunity to contest taking, plaintiff, being without adequate remedy at law was entitled to equitable relief to obtain review of taking. 146 C. 237. Compensation may take into consideration moving expenses if these affect fair market value. 147 C. 362. Cited. 150 C. 44; 152 C. 139. Equitable relief indicated to review agency's taking of property as no adequate remedy exists at law to contest taking. 154 C. 446. Only factors in existence on date of taking land may be considered in determining just compensation; where plaintiff completed move from building prior to date of taking, moving costs not a factor. 155 C. 89. On date of recording of certificate of taking of defendant's property, title vested in municipality and, where possession was withheld by defendant for ten months thereafter, municipality was entitled to the reasonable value of defendant's use and occupation. Id., 397. As no single method of valuation was controlling, referee rightly selected most appropriate one for facts he found. 158 C. 37. City's postponement in applying for certificate of taking until determination of plaintiff condemnee's application for temporary injunction was proper and certificate was validly issued to city thereafter, although more than ninety days after statement of compensation filed. Id., 522. Cited. 160 C. 492; 162 C. 527. Valuation of special use when no comparable sales exist. 164 C. 254. Valuation of restrictive covenant owned in gross, for nonpecuniary charitable purpose. Id., 337. Cited. 168 C. 135; 173 C. 525; 175 C. 265; 179 C. 293; 181 C. 217; 203 C. 364. Date of taking is fixed by statute only in the absence of special equitable considerations; court assumed, without deciding, that statute applicable to a taking by city of