Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g
- Citation
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Source
- Official source
- Original Source
- https://www.cga.ct.gov/current/pub/chap_126a.htm#sec_8-30g ↗
Related Parts of This Source
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-30g
Full Text
1,434 charsCourt held that legislature intended statute's appeals procedure to apply to defendant's legislative decision to grant or deny a zone change in connection with an affordable housing proposal. 228 C. 498. Cited. 232 C. 122. Denial by planning commission of master plan for affordable housing development does not invalidate appeal of decision by zoning commission denying proposed changes to zoning regulations and map because viability of such changes not dependent on viability of such master plan. 271 C. 1. Denial of sewer application by water pollution control authority is valid reason for denial of subdivision application for affordable housing development by the planning commission and commission has no authority to approve subdivision application on condition sewer application is approved. Id., 41. Statutory scheme for historic districts created to safeguard public interest in historic preservation contains no indication that this interest includes consideration of the potential visibility from the historic district of a building or structure that would be located in another zoning district entirely; where application to develop affordable housing units on subject property included application for zoning regulation text amendment for entire zone district, this section did not govern plaintiff's request for zone text amendment to zoning regulations governing any property other than subject property. 349 C. 647.