Chen v. Kraft (2016)
- Citation
- Chen v. Kraft (2016)
- Parent Document
- Chen v. Kraft (2016)
- Jurisdiction
- California (state)
- Effective Date
- 2016-01-13
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/3169388/chen-v-kraft/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (22)
- Chen v. Kraft (2016)
- Chen v. Kraft (2016)
- Chen v. Kraft (2016)
- Chen v. Kraft (2016)
- Chen v. Kraft (2016)
- Chen v. Kraft (2016)
- Chen v. Kraft (2016)
- Chen v. Kraft (2016)
- Chen v. Kraft (2016)
- Chen v. Kraft (2016)
- Chen v. Kraft (2016)
- Chen v. Kraft (2016)
- Chen v. Kraft (2016)
- Chen v. Kraft (2016)
- Chen v. Kraft (2016)
- Chen v. Kraft (2016)
- Chen v. Kraft (2016)
- Chen v. Kraft (2016)
- Chen v. Kraft (2016)
- Chen v. Kraft (2016)
- Chen v. Kraft (2016)
- Chen v. Kraft (2016)
Full Text
398 charsdiscretion without violating any Rental Lease Restrictions that may exist in the effective Lease
Agreement between Landlord and Tenant. . . .”
5
We note here that, contrary to plaintiff’s assertions, a defendant in an unlawful detainer action is
not required to file a separate statement of disputed facts in support of its opposition to an MSJ. (Code
Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (r).)