Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Citation
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Parent Document
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Jurisdiction
- California (state)
- Effective Date
- 1989-08-22
Other Sections in This Document (38)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Section 998
- Section 998
- Section 998
- Section 998
- Section 998
- Section 998
- Section 998
- Section 998
- Section 998
- Section 998
- section 37
- section 37
- section 37
Full Text
713 charsTo oppose the eviction, appellants retained the Tenderloin Housing Clinic and filed complaints with the Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Board. Respondents’ attorney, Leung, was eventually persuaded that the eviction notices were in fact illegal and advised appellants’ attorney that they could remain in the rooming house. By this time, however, appellants had found other quarters. Meanwhile, the Department of Public Works informed respondents that the use of the property as a boarding house was in violation of the building code. Ultimately, appellants moved to other apartments; and upon securing necessary permits, respondents renovated the building so that it could be rented as three flats.