Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

13315 Owners Corp. v. Kennedy, 4 Misc. 3d 931 (2004)

Citation
13315 Owners Corp. v. Kennedy, 4 Misc. 3d 931 (2004)
Parent Document
13315 Owners Corp. v. Kennedy, 4 Misc. 3d 931 (2004)
Jurisdiction
New York (state)
Effective Date
2004-06-29

Other Sections in This Document (76)

Full Text

1,062 chars
Respondent points to paragraph 31 (c) of the proprietary lease, which addresses unauthorized subletting and gives a lessee 10 days to cause the unauthorized sublessee to vacate the apartment after receiving written notice from the lessor. (Petitioner’s notice of motion, exhibit C.) Respondent argues that petitioner may not bypass the obligation to provide a notice to cure. {See respondent’s affidavit in support of cross motion 1Í 23.) The court disagrees. From petitioner’s perspective, the objectionable conduct in this proceeding stems as much from respondent — ignoring petitioner’s letters, allegedly allowing Holland to violate rules, and renewing Holland’s sublease despite the board’s objections — as it does from respondent’s unauthorized second sublease with Holland. Furthermore, the alleged objectionable conduct, to the extent it occurred, cannot be cured. The apartment has already been damaged, and the other shareholder-tenants have already been upset by the noise, hav*945ing their heat cut off, and having someone in their building arrested.