Wilson v. 30 Broad Street Associates, L.P., 178 Misc. 2d 257 (1998)
- Citation
- Wilson v. 30 Broad Street Associates, L.P., 178 Misc. 2d 257 (1998)
- Parent Document
- Wilson v. 30 Broad Street Associates, L.P., 178 Misc. 2d 257 (1998)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 1998-09-14
Other Sections in This Document (14)
- Wilson v. 30 Broad Street Associates, L.P., 178 Misc. 2d 257 (1998)
- Wilson v. 30 Broad Street Associates, L.P., 178 Misc. 2d 257 (1998)
- Wilson v. 30 Broad Street Associates, L.P., 178 Misc. 2d 257 (1998)
- Wilson v. 30 Broad Street Associates, L.P., 178 Misc. 2d 257 (1998)
- Wilson v. 30 Broad Street Associates, L.P., 178 Misc. 2d 257 (1998)
- Wilson v. 30 Broad Street Associates, L.P., 178 Misc. 2d 257 (1998)
- Wilson v. 30 Broad Street Associates, L.P., 178 Misc. 2d 257 (1998)
- Wilson v. 30 Broad Street Associates, L.P., 178 Misc. 2d 257 (1998)
- Wilson v. 30 Broad Street Associates, L.P., 178 Misc. 2d 257 (1998)
- Wilson v. 30 Broad Street Associates, L.P., 178 Misc. 2d 257 (1998)
- Wilson v. 30 Broad Street Associates, L.P., 178 Misc. 2d 257 (1998)
- Wilson v. 30 Broad Street Associates, L.P., 178 Misc. 2d 257 (1998)
- Wilson v. 30 Broad Street Associates, L.P., 178 Misc. 2d 257 (1998)
- Wilson v. 30 Broad Street Associates, L.P., 178 Misc. 2d 257 (1998)
Full Text
616 charsIn this instance, respondent initially did not know of petitioner’s presence, occupancy or possession but learned his identity, by accepting rent, before the warrant was executed. In fact, respondent knew petitioner’s identity before the execution of the amended stipulation on February 2, 1998, because respondent had been accepting rent for five months from him *260since December 15, 1997, and respondent’s managing agent rectified several complaints, claiming mitigation of losses from Murphy Marseilles, yet respondent failed to include petitioner in the amended stipulation or the reissued warrant of eviction.