DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Tibta v. 156 E 21 LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 25064 (2025)

Citation
Tibta v. 156 E 21 LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 25064 (2025)
Parent Document
Tibta v. 156 E 21 LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 25064 (2025)
Jurisdiction
New York (state)
Effective Date
2025-03-18
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10360937/tibta-v-156-e-21-llc/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (50)

Full Text

485 chars 
Regardless, the court is mindful of the view that it is incumbent on the court to set an undertaking pursuant to CPLR 5519 (a) (6). In Oleck v Pearlman, 49 Misc 2d 202 (Sup Ct, Kings County 1966), the court, interpreting the newly enacted CPLR 5519, found that it was "necessary to determine as a matter of first impression whether . . . the court of first instance may arbitrarily decline to fix any bond at all[,]" and determined that "it may not." (Pearlman, 49 Misc 2d at 202-203.)