Section 2525
- Citation
- Section 2525
- Parent Document
- London Terrace Gardens v. Stevens, 159 Misc. 2d 542 (1993)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 1993-09-15
Other Sections in This Document (22)
- London Terrace Gardens v. Stevens, 159 Misc. 2d 542 (1993)
- London Terrace Gardens v. Stevens, 159 Misc. 2d 542 (1993)
- London Terrace Gardens v. Stevens, 159 Misc. 2d 542 (1993)
- London Terrace Gardens v. Stevens, 159 Misc. 2d 542 (1993)
- London Terrace Gardens v. Stevens, 159 Misc. 2d 542 (1993)
- London Terrace Gardens v. Stevens, 159 Misc. 2d 542 (1993)
- London Terrace Gardens v. Stevens, 159 Misc. 2d 542 (1993)
- Section 2525
- Section 2525
- Section 2525
- Section 2525
- Section 2525
- Section 2525
- Section 2525
- Section 2525
- Section 2525
- Section 2525
- Section 2525
- Section 2525
- Section 2525
- Section 2525
- Section 2525
Full Text
490 charsThe conclusion that a written three-day notice or rent demand under RPAPL 711 (2) may not include a demand for payment of charges other than the legal regulated rent is a logical extension of the holding of the Appellate Term in Silber v Schwartzman. (Supra.) It enforces the mandate of the rent stabilization and rent control laws that only legal regulated rent may be "demanded or received,” and the principle that only a demand for legal regulated rent may support a possessory judgment.