J.D. Realty Associates v. Jorrin, 166 Misc. 2d 175 (1995)
- Citation
- J.D. Realty Associates v. Jorrin, 166 Misc. 2d 175 (1995)
- Parent Document
- J.D. Realty Associates v. Jorrin, 166 Misc. 2d 175 (1995)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 1995-09-12
Other Sections in This Document (22)
- J.D. Realty Associates v. Jorrin, 166 Misc. 2d 175 (1995)
- J.D. Realty Associates v. Jorrin, 166 Misc. 2d 175 (1995)
- J.D. Realty Associates v. Jorrin, 166 Misc. 2d 175 (1995)
- J.D. Realty Associates v. Jorrin, 166 Misc. 2d 175 (1995)
- J.D. Realty Associates v. Jorrin, 166 Misc. 2d 175 (1995)
- J.D. Realty Associates v. Jorrin, 166 Misc. 2d 175 (1995)
- J.D. Realty Associates v. Jorrin, 166 Misc. 2d 175 (1995)
- J.D. Realty Associates v. Jorrin, 166 Misc. 2d 175 (1995)
- J.D. Realty Associates v. Jorrin, 166 Misc. 2d 175 (1995)
- J.D. Realty Associates v. Jorrin, 166 Misc. 2d 175 (1995)
- J.D. Realty Associates v. Jorrin, 166 Misc. 2d 175 (1995)
- J.D. Realty Associates v. Jorrin, 166 Misc. 2d 175 (1995)
- J.D. Realty Associates v. Jorrin, 166 Misc. 2d 175 (1995)
- J.D. Realty Associates v. Jorrin, 166 Misc. 2d 175 (1995)
- J.D. Realty Associates v. Jorrin, 166 Misc. 2d 175 (1995)
- J.D. Realty Associates v. Jorrin, 166 Misc. 2d 175 (1995)
- J.D. Realty Associates v. Jorrin, 166 Misc. 2d 175 (1995)
- J.D. Realty Associates v. Jorrin, 166 Misc. 2d 175 (1995)
- J.D. Realty Associates v. Jorrin, 166 Misc. 2d 175 (1995)
- J.D. Realty Associates v. Jorrin, 166 Misc. 2d 175 (1995)
- J.D. Realty Associates v. Jorrin, 166 Misc. 2d 175 (1995)
- J.D. Realty Associates v. Jorrin, 166 Misc. 2d 175 (1995)
Full Text
756 chars. In a commercial holdover proceeding, the Third Department held that a landlord’s contractual notice of default, drafted and served in compliance with a lease provision, was sufficient to trigger a conditional limitation, although it did not demand payment of a specific amount. (Matter of Ranalli v Burns, 157 AD2d 936.) Ranalli is inapposite here. Not only is it fact specific; the contractual notice in Ranalli is a different kind of notice than the statutory notice at issue here, which must conform to the requirement of RPAPL 711 (2). The citation to "RPAPL 711 [1], [2]” (Matter of Ranalli v Burns, supra, at 937) is an apparent error; RPAPL 711 (2) applies to nonpayment proceedings like the instant case, not to holdover proceedings like Ranalli.