Bogatz v. Extra Touch International, Inc., 179 Misc. 2d 1029 (1999)
- Citation
- Bogatz v. Extra Touch International, Inc., 179 Misc. 2d 1029 (1999)
- Parent Document
- Bogatz v. Extra Touch International, Inc., 179 Misc. 2d 1029 (1999)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 1999-03-03
Other Sections in This Document (17)
- Bogatz v. Extra Touch International, Inc., 179 Misc. 2d 1029 (1999)
- Bogatz v. Extra Touch International, Inc., 179 Misc. 2d 1029 (1999)
- Bogatz v. Extra Touch International, Inc., 179 Misc. 2d 1029 (1999)
- Bogatz v. Extra Touch International, Inc., 179 Misc. 2d 1029 (1999)
- Bogatz v. Extra Touch International, Inc., 179 Misc. 2d 1029 (1999)
- Bogatz v. Extra Touch International, Inc., 179 Misc. 2d 1029 (1999)
- Bogatz v. Extra Touch International, Inc., 179 Misc. 2d 1029 (1999)
- Bogatz v. Extra Touch International, Inc., 179 Misc. 2d 1029 (1999)
- Bogatz v. Extra Touch International, Inc., 179 Misc. 2d 1029 (1999)
- Bogatz v. Extra Touch International, Inc., 179 Misc. 2d 1029 (1999)
- Bogatz v. Extra Touch International, Inc., 179 Misc. 2d 1029 (1999)
- Bogatz v. Extra Touch International, Inc., 179 Misc. 2d 1029 (1999)
- Bogatz v. Extra Touch International, Inc., 179 Misc. 2d 1029 (1999)
- Bogatz v. Extra Touch International, Inc., 179 Misc. 2d 1029 (1999)
- Bogatz v. Extra Touch International, Inc., 179 Misc. 2d 1029 (1999)
- Bogatz v. Extra Touch International, Inc., 179 Misc. 2d 1029 (1999)
- Bogatz v. Extra Touch International, Inc., 179 Misc. 2d 1029 (1999)
Full Text
846 charsThe instant proceeding is brought under RPAPL 711 (1), “[a] proceeding seeking to recover possession of real property by reason of the termination of the term fixed in the lease pursuant to a provision contained therein giving the landlord the right to terminate the time fixed for occupancy under such agreement if he deem the tenant objectionable”. Subdivision (1) of RPAPL 711 does not require any notice prior to commencing the action, while RPAPL 711 (2) (concerning nonpayment cases) specifically does require notice “served * * * as prescribed in section 735”. There are several statutes concerning predicate notices. For example, RPAPL 713 concerns evictions where no landlord-tenant relationship exists. This section requires service of a “ten-day notice to quit * * * served upon the respondent in the manner prescribed in section 735”.