Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Bogatz v. Extra Touch International, Inc., 179 Misc. 2d 1029 (1999)

Citation
Bogatz v. Extra Touch International, Inc., 179 Misc. 2d 1029 (1999)
Parent Document
Bogatz v. Extra Touch International, Inc., 179 Misc. 2d 1029 (1999)
Jurisdiction
New York (state)
Effective Date
1999-03-03

Full Text

659 chars
The default provision contained in the lease herein creates a conditional limitation. Thus, a summary proceeding may be *1032brought after the notice of termination is served. (South St. Seaport Ltd. Partnership v Jade Sea Rest. 151 Misc 2d 725 [Civ Ct, NY County 1991]; Matter of Ranalli v Burns, 157 AD2d 936 [3d Dept 1990]; Grabino v Howard Stores Corp., 110 Misc 2d 591 [Civ Ct, Kings County 1981].) If the lease clause merely created a condition, a summary proceeding would not lie. (2 Rasch, New York Landlord and Tenant — Summary Proceedings §§ 23:29, 23:30 [3d ed 1988]; Perrotta v Western Regional Off-Track Betting Corp., 98 AD2d 1 [4th Dept 1983].)