Callahan v. Reid, 119 Misc. 2d 190 (1983)
- Citation
- Callahan v. Reid, 119 Misc. 2d 190 (1983)
- Parent Document
- Callahan v. Reid, 119 Misc. 2d 190 (1983)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 1983-05-13
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/6334915/callahan-v-reid/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (10)
- Callahan v. Reid, 119 Misc. 2d 190 (1983)
- Callahan v. Reid, 119 Misc. 2d 190 (1983)
- Callahan v. Reid, 119 Misc. 2d 190 (1983)
- Callahan v. Reid, 119 Misc. 2d 190 (1983)
- Callahan v. Reid, 119 Misc. 2d 190 (1983)
- Callahan v. Reid, 119 Misc. 2d 190 (1983)
- Callahan v. Reid, 119 Misc. 2d 190 (1983)
- Callahan v. Reid, 119 Misc. 2d 190 (1983)
- Callahan v. Reid, 119 Misc. 2d 190 (1983)
- Callahan v. Reid, 119 Misc. 2d 190 (1983)
Full Text
397 charsOf course, there are situations where u and o are set at less than the previous rent, because tenant had asserted the warranty during the previous action or the negotiations, prior to stipulation. In such a case, tenant should not be able to “double-dip” by getting a further reduction in u and o. However, that is not the stipulation here. U and o was set at the same amount as the previous rent.