Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Nestor v. Britt, 16 Misc. 3d 368 (2007)

Citation
Nestor v. Britt, 16 Misc. 3d 368 (2007)
Parent Document
Nestor v. Britt, 16 Misc. 3d 368 (2007)
Jurisdiction
New York (state)
Effective Date
2007-04-23

Other Sections in This Document (49)

Full Text

472 chars
On cross-examination, Lamb conceded that one of his entries on July 3, 2006, for 2.7 hours for “[preparation of sur-reply in further opposition to use and occupancy motion,” was a duplicative entry and should be excluded. In addition, Lamb conceded that Kastner’s entry on December 14, 2006, for “Conference with KH; conference with BC; draft and revise stipulation of settlement; conference with KH re: revisions,” was for an unrelated matter and should also be excluded.