Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

520 East 86th Street, Inc. v. Leventritt, 127 Misc. 2d 566 (1985)

Citation
520 East 86th Street, Inc. v. Leventritt, 127 Misc. 2d 566 (1985)
Parent Document
520 East 86th Street, Inc. v. Leventritt, 127 Misc. 2d 566 (1985)
Jurisdiction
New York (state)
Effective Date
1985-03-11

Other Sections in This Document (25)

Full Text

691 chars
It thus appears that the Appellate Term has conclusively determined the issue presented with respect to commercial premises. It would further appear that, in light of the Appellate Term’s pronouncement in Grand Liberte (supra) that such conditional limitations are valid in the commercial context, that two other cases involving the same issue which were decided by me prior to the Grand Liberte case, although never appealed from, *569are no longer representative of the law in New York City. (See, 950 Third Ave. Co. v Eastland Indus., 119 Misc 2d 19 [Civ Ct, NY County 1983]; Mostazafan Found. v American Center for Life Assistance, NYLJ, Sept. 19, 1983, p 16, col 5 [Civ Ct, NY County].)