Rochdale Vil., Inc. v. Hallerdin-Grant, 2024 NY Slip Op 24192 (2024)

Citation: Rochdale Vil., Inc. v. Hallerdin-Grant, 2024 NY Slip Op 24192 (2024)
Parent Document: Rochdale Vil., Inc. v. Hallerdin-Grant, 2024 NY Slip Op 24192 (2024)
Jurisdiction: New York (state)
Effective Date: 2024-07-10
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/9999992/rochdale-vil-inc-v-hallerdin-grant/ ↗

Full Text

921 chars

The subject premises are a limited profit cooperative corporation organized under Article II of the Private Housing Finance Law, commonly referred to as the Mitchell-Lama Law, a statutory scheme intended to provide affordable housing to low- and middle-income families (see Berkovich v Motovaya, 22 Misc 3d 91 [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2009], citing Private Housing Finance Law § 11). As a state-assisted Mitchell-Lama cooperative, the building is under the supervision of the Division of Housing and Community Renewal ("DHCR"), which sets the monthly maintenance and other carrying charges and has promulgated regulations setting forth the requirements for termination of tenancies (see 9 NYCRR §§ 1727-5.3). Respondent is the owner of the shares of stock associated with the subject cooperative apartment and is a tenant-cooperator pursuant to an occupancy agreement with Petitioner (see NYSCEF 12).

Other Sections in This Document (22)

Full Text