The court disagrees. The allegations concerning heat, gas, hot water, and electricity are set out in a conclusory fashion. One building has its entrance on Stockholm Street while the other has its entrance on Irving Avenue. Respondents characterize *472the buildings as a front structure and a rear structure, but they do not state whether the buildings are attached, semi-attached, adjacent, or otherwise. Copies of photographs annexed as exhibits,3 however, seem to show that the buildings are separated from each other by a distance which the court estimates at 20 feet. In addition, one photograph shows a van parked between the two buildings with several feet of space on either side of the van; from the photograph alone, one cannot rule out that the space is not simply a driveway into the parcel but instead is one end of a private street or alleyway that runs parallel to Irving Avenue for the length of the entire block. The court declines to hold that the moving papers demonstrate as a matter of law that the two buildings constitute a horizontal multiple dwelling.