However, respondent filed the instant motion seeking to withdraw exhibits “B” and “L” entered into evidence. Respondent’s attorney in his affirmation states that information came to his attention shortly after the May 19, 2017 court appearance that requires withdrawal of the exhibits (Briker affirmation ¶ 7). Petitioner in opposition argues that there is no legal authority that permits the withdrawal of those exhibits. Petitioner asserts that it is entitled to know the reason for the withdrawal and that respondent’s vague reasoning is insufficient. Respondent’s counsel in reply concedes that there is no precise legal authority to withdraw the exhibits but that the authority for withdrawal lies in the Rules of Professional Conduct (22 NYCRR 1200.0). Counsel adds that withdrawal of the “evidence fully remediates the problem, [and] any further discussion of the basis for the motion is precluded by attorney-client privilege” (Briker reply affirmation f 5).