Poyck v. Bryant, 13 Misc. 3d 699 (2006)
- Citation
- Poyck v. Bryant, 13 Misc. 3d 699 (2006)
- Parent Document
- Poyck v. Bryant, 13 Misc. 3d 699 (2006)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 2006-08-24
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/6307489/poyck-v-bryant/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (31)
- Poyck v. Bryant, 13 Misc. 3d 699 (2006)
- Poyck v. Bryant, 13 Misc. 3d 699 (2006)
- Poyck v. Bryant, 13 Misc. 3d 699 (2006)
- Poyck v. Bryant, 13 Misc. 3d 699 (2006)
- Poyck v. Bryant, 13 Misc. 3d 699 (2006)
- Poyck v. Bryant, 13 Misc. 3d 699 (2006)
- Poyck v. Bryant, 13 Misc. 3d 699 (2006)
- Poyck v. Bryant, 13 Misc. 3d 699 (2006)
- Poyck v. Bryant, 13 Misc. 3d 699 (2006)
- Poyck v. Bryant, 13 Misc. 3d 699 (2006)
- Poyck v. Bryant, 13 Misc. 3d 699 (2006)
- Poyck v. Bryant, 13 Misc. 3d 699 (2006)
- Poyck v. Bryant, 13 Misc. 3d 699 (2006)
- Poyck v. Bryant, 13 Misc. 3d 699 (2006)
- Poyck v. Bryant, 13 Misc. 3d 699 (2006)
- Poyck v. Bryant, 13 Misc. 3d 699 (2006)
- Poyck v. Bryant, 13 Misc. 3d 699 (2006)
- Poyck v. Bryant, 13 Misc. 3d 699 (2006)
- Poyck v. Bryant, 13 Misc. 3d 699 (2006)
- Poyck v. Bryant, 13 Misc. 3d 699 (2006)
- Poyck v. Bryant, 13 Misc. 3d 699 (2006)
- Poyck v. Bryant, 13 Misc. 3d 699 (2006)
- Poyck v. Bryant, 13 Misc. 3d 699 (2006)
- Poyck v. Bryant, 13 Misc. 3d 699 (2006)
- Poyck v. Bryant, 13 Misc. 3d 699 (2006)
- Poyck v. Bryant, 13 Misc. 3d 699 (2006)
- Poyck v. Bryant, 13 Misc. 3d 699 (2006)
- Poyck v. Bryant, 13 Misc. 3d 699 (2006)
- Poyck v. Bryant, 13 Misc. 3d 699 (2006)
- Poyck v. Bryant, 13 Misc. 3d 699 (2006)
- Poyck v. Bryant, 13 Misc. 3d 699 (2006)
Full Text
598 charsPlaintiff Peter Poyck (plaintiff, landlord, or Poyck) commenced this plenary action to collect rent and late charges for the months of August 2001 through December 2001, at $2,597 per month. (See exhibit E to the motion.) Defendants Stan Bryant and Michelle Bryant (defendants, tenants, or the Bryants) interposed a written answer, inter alia, denying the allegations of the complaint and asserting their third and fourth affirmative defenses and first and second counterclaims for breach of warranty of habitability and constructive eviction due to secondhand smoke. (See exhibit F to the motion.)