NYCHA Coney Island Houses v. Ramos, 41 Misc. 3d 702 (2013)

Citation: NYCHA Coney Island Houses v. Ramos, 41 Misc. 3d 702 (2013)
Parent Document: NYCHA Coney Island Houses v. Ramos, 41 Misc. 3d 702 (2013)
Jurisdiction: New York (state)
Effective Date: 2013-09-16
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/6314716/nycha-coney-island-houses-v-ramos/ ↗

Full Text

621 chars

Alternatively, petitioner argues that if respondent is granted leave to interpose the proposed answer, the amended answer *708should be limited to the three conditions that respondent mainly complained about, specifically, the ceiling leak over the toilet, the mold in the hallway and the defective bathroom vent (Bayley affirmation 1Í 5). Petitioner also argues that it is improper to amend the answer to interpose the alleged conditions/repairs because counsel for the respondent did not raise the need for repairs in every “two attorney” stipulation executed by the attorneys for the parties (Bayley affirmation 1i 5).

Other Sections in This Document (70)

Full Text